Daniel Crecelius

475 citations
29 papers · 215 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Crecelius

24 papers receiving 141 citations

Peers

Daniel Crecelius
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Anthropology 67
  • Political Science and International Relations 160
  • Archeology 40
  • Space and Planetary Science 4
  • Archeology 3
Replace Madeline C. Zilfi with:
Madeline C. Zilfi United States
Kenneth M. Cuno United States
R. D. McChesney United States
Baber Johansen United States
William Ochsenwald United States
Aharon Layish Israel
Robert G. Landen
Nelly Hanna Egypt
Michael G. Morony United States
Jamil M. Abun-Nasr
Daniel Crecelius relative to Madeline C. Zilfi United States Madeline C. Zilfi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Madeline C. Zilfi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Crecelius

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Crecelius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Crecelius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Crecelius more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Crecelius

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Crecelius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Crecelius. The network helps show where Daniel Crecelius may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Crecelius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Crecelius Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Crecelius links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198557
2 199435
3 198032
4 199113
5 199912
6 19719
7 19869
8 19839
9 19835
10 19935
11 19954
12 19924
13 19933
14 19942
15 19942
16 19912
17 19872
18 19752
19 20141
20 20021

About Daniel Crecelius

Daniel Crecelius is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Archeology, Anthropology, Accounting and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 29 papers that have together received 215 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Islamic Studies and History (21 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (15 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (9 papers), Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (6 papers), African history and culture analysis (4 papers), Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender (3 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (3 papers) and Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (67 citations), Political Science and International Relations (160 citations), Archeology (40 citations), Space and Planetary Science (4 citations) and Archeology (3 citations). Daniel Crecelius has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Afaf Lutfi Al‐Sayyid Marsot, Kenneth M. Cuno, Peter Gran, Carl F. Petry and Reinhard Schulze. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, The American Historical Review, International Journal Middle East Studies, The International Journal of African Historical Studies and Die Welt des Islams.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact