Daniel Cocks

747 citations
39 papers · 558 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Cocks

37 papers receiving 535 citations

Peers

Daniel Cocks
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 456
  • Condensed Matter Physics 66
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 27
  • Modeling and Simulation 17
  • Radiation 30
Replace E.J.D. Vredenbregt with:
E.J.D. Vredenbregt Netherlands
В. Ф. Елесин Russia
Lan Yin China
K. Schneider Germany
H. G. C. Werij Netherlands
A. E. Meyerovich United States
Hiroshi Ezawa Japan
Ilya Charaev United States
P. Christillin Italy
E. J. Gamboa United States
Daniel Cocks relative to E.J.D. Vredenbregt Netherlands E.J.D. Vredenbregt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
E.J.D. Vredenbregt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Cocks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Cocks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Cocks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Cocks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Cocks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Cocks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Cocks. The network helps show where Daniel Cocks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Cocks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Cocks Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Cocks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201385
2 201266
3 201251
4 201832
5 201431
6 201525
7 201623
8 201722
9
A multi-term solution of the space-time Boltzmann equation for electrons in gases and liquids
201722
10 201720
11 202118
12 201217
13 201517
14 201715
15 201515
16 201810
17 201710
18 20199
19 20189
20 20209

About Daniel Cocks

Daniel Cocks is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Mechanics of Materials and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 39 papers that have together received 558 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (15 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (12 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (9 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (7 papers), Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (7 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (7 papers), Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (6 papers) and Muon and positron interactions and applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (456 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (66 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (27 citations), Modeling and Simulation (17 citations) and Radiation (30 citations). Daniel Cocks has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and Serbia. Frequent co-authors include Walter Hofstetter, Ronald D. White, G. J. Boyle, Michael Buchhold, Saša Dujko, M. J. Brunger, Stephan Rachel, Antonio Negretti, Ulf Bissbort and R. Gerritsma. Their work appears in journals such as Plasma Sources Science and Technology, Physical Review A, Physical Review Letters, The European Physical Journal D and The Journal of Chemical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact