Daniel Chernilo

1.6k citations
53 papers · 793 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Chernilo

43 papers receiving 664 citations

Peers

Daniel Chernilo
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Sociology and Political Science 490
  • Geography, Planning and Development 40
  • Political Science and International Relations 196
  • Cultural Studies 49
  • Philosophy 62
Replace Louisa Schein with:
Louisa Schein United States
Cynthia Weber United Kingdom
John Breuilly United Kingdom
Jeffrey Ν. Wasserstrom United States
Rhys Williams United States
Ariel Heryanto Australia
Kate Darian‐Smith Australia
Debbie Lisle United Kingdom
Gregory Starrett United States
Peter Mandler United Kingdom
Daniel Chernilo relative to Louisa Schein United States Louisa Schein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Louisa Schein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Chernilo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Chernilo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Chernilo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Chernilo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Chernilo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Chernilo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Chernilo. The network helps show where Daniel Chernilo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Chernilo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Chernilo Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Chernilo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006197
2 201196
3 201652
4 200240
5 201440
6 200835
7 200632
8 200732
9 201331
10 201728
11 201726
12 201622
13 201019
14 202118
15 200917
16 200515
17 200811
18 20208
19 20037
20
Universalismo, particularismo y sociedad mundial: obstáculos y perspectivas de la sociología en América Latina
20057

About Daniel Chernilo

Daniel Chernilo is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Geography, Planning and Development, Cultural Studies, Philosophy and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 53 papers that have together received 793 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (30 papers), German Social Sciences and History (15 papers), Legal and Social Philosophy (8 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (8 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (8 papers), Nationalism and Cultural Identity (6 papers), Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (6 papers) and Philosophy and Historical Thought (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (490 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (40 citations), Political Science and International Relations (196 citations), Cultural Studies (49 citations) and Philosophy (62 citations). Daniel Chernilo has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Aldo Mascareño, Robert D. Fine and David Gareth Beer. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Social Theory, British Journal of Sociology, Theory Culture & Society, Cinta de moebio and Contemporary Political Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact