Daniel Cherix

1.4k citations
53 papers · 1.1k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Cherix

51 papers receiving 978 citations

Peers

Daniel Cherix
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 731
  • Insect Science 458
  • Ecological Modeling 119
  • Genetics 708
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 139
Replace Og DeSouza with:
Og DeSouza Brazil
Martin A. Schäfer Switzerland
Stephanie S. Bauerfeind Germany
J. L. Bossart United States
Stephen A. Marshall Canada
Paul D. Krushelnycky United States
Alexander B. Ruchin Russia
Ángel L. Viloria Venezuela
Nikolaus U. Szucsich Austria
Nivar Gobbi Brazil
Daniel Cherix relative to Og DeSouza Brazil Og DeSouza's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Og DeSouza · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Cherix

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Cherix's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Cherix with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Cherix more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Cherix

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Cherix. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Cherix. The network helps show where Daniel Cherix may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Cherix, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Cherix Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Cherix links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201287
2 200776
3 201368
4 199955
5 201254
6 198048
7 199247
8 201346
9 199345
10 198043
11 198940
12 199340
13 200240
14 202136
15
Relation between diet and polyethism in Formica colonies
198733
16 199125
17
Diversity and genetic structure of the wood ant Formica lugubris in unmanaged forests
200524
18 201223
19 201022
20 201720

About Daniel Cherix

Daniel Cherix is a scholar working on Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Social Psychology and Ecological Modeling, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (38 papers), Plant and animal studies (30 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (7 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (7 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (6 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (5 papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (731 citations), Insect Science (458 citations), Ecological Modeling (119 citations), Genetics (708 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (139 citations). Daniel Cherix has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Finland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Pekka Pamilo, Rainer Rosengren, Thomas Pape, Antoine Guisan, Laurent Keller, Ramona Maggini, Christian Bernasconi, J D Bourne, David Fletcher and Wilhelm Fortelius. Their work appears in journals such as Insectes Sociaux, Oikos, Ethology Ecology & Evolution, Annales Zoologici Fennici and Systematic Entomology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact