Daniel C. Dim

961 citations
25 papers · 648 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel C. Dim

25 papers receiving 634 citations

Peers

Daniel C. Dim
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 33
  • Oncology 209
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 102
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 176
  • Dermatology 40
Replace Michael Bzorek with:
Michael Bzorek Denmark
Weiguo Yin China
Paola Cordiali‐Fei Italy
Bobe Petrushev Romania
Teruki Yanagi Japan
Toshinori Ando Japan
Alexandra Iulia Irimie Romania
N. Nissen United States
Ramazan Rezaei Iran
Emöke Rácz Netherlands
Daniel C. Dim relative to Michael Bzorek Denmark Michael Bzorek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Michael Bzorek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Dim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Dim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Dim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Dim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Dim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Dim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Dim. The network helps show where Daniel C. Dim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel C. Dim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel C. Dim Line = papers co-authored together Daniel C. Dim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014128
2 200781
3 200773
4 201351
5 201539
6 201138
7 201634
8 201031
9 201628
10 200625
11 200924
12 201722
13 201217
14 201512
15 20089
16 20077
17 20095
18 20185
19 20104
20 20124

About Daniel C. Dim

Daniel C. Dim is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 25 papers that have together received 648 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas (6 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (4 papers), Cardiac tumors and thrombi (3 papers), Musculoskeletal synovial abnormalities and treatments (2 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (2 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (2 papers) and Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (33 citations), Oncology (209 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (102 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (176 citations) and Dermatology (40 citations). Daniel C. Dim has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Roberto N. Miranda, Linda D. Cooley, Rivka L. Shoulson, Bhupendra Singh, Hari K. Bhat, Nimee K. Bhat, Anwesha Chatterjee, Amruta Ronghe, Hong Peng and Agostino Molteni. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Molecular Pharmaceutics, Journal of Clinical Oncology, International Journal of Gynecological Pathology and Acta Cytologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact