Daniel Baxter

579 citations
10 papers · 354 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Baxter

9 papers receiving 346 citations

Peers

Daniel Baxter
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Applied Psychology 102
  • Social Psychology 201
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 87
  • Marketing 47
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 68
Replace Sofya Nartova‐Bochaver with:
Sofya Nartova‐Bochaver Russia
Fanli Jia United States
Julie Van de Vyver United Kingdom
Kendall Soucie Canada
Terell P. Lasane United States
Mindi S. Rock United States
Sina A. Klein Germany
Valérie Fointiat France
Dan Dolderman Canada
Cleonice Pereira dos Santos Camino Brazil
Daniel Baxter relative to Sofya Nartova‐Bochaver Russia Sofya Nartova‐Bochaver's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sofya Nartova‐Bochaver · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Baxter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Baxter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Baxter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Baxter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Baxter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Baxter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Baxter. The network helps show where Daniel Baxter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Baxter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Baxter Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Baxter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2016121
2 2018106
3 201647
4 202038
5 201232
6 20214
7 20223
8 20182
9 20231
10 20230

About Daniel Baxter

Daniel Baxter is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Safety Research, having authored 10 papers that have together received 354 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (3 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (2 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers), Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research (2 papers), Night-time city culture (1 paper) and Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (102 citations), Social Psychology (201 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (87 citations), Marketing (47 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (68 citations). Daniel Baxter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Luc G. Pelletier, Meredith Rocchi, Veronika Huta, Steve Jones and Nick Davies. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Event and Festival Management, Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, The Journal of Positive Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences and Journal of Policy Research in Tourism Leisure and Events.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact