Daniel B. Shank
Impact in
- Safety Research top 1%
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Health Informatics top 5%
Papers in
-
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI 11
-
- Cultural Differences and Values 8
- Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion 5
- Co-authors
- Patrick Gamez (3 shared papers)Shelia R. Cotten (3 shared papers)Sophia Rodriguez (1 shared paper)Christopher Graves (1 shared paper)R. W. McClendon (2 shared papers)Gerrit Hoogenboom (2 shared papers)Casey Canfield (6 shared papers)Yoshihisa Kashima (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Computers in Human Behavior (4 papers)International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (3 papers)Climatic Change (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Sociological Forum (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaGermany
In The Last Decade
Daniel B. Shank
52 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Safety Research 328
- Health Informatics 35
- Information Systems and Management 112
- Cognitive Neuroscience 276
- Social Psychology 240
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel B. Shank
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel B. Shank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel B. Shank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel B. Shank more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel B. Shank
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel B. Shank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel B. Shank. The network helps show where Daniel B. Shank may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel B. Shank, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 208 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 142 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 110 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 69 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 69 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 53 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 39 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 37 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 36 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 33 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 30 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 26 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 25 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 23 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 19 |
About Daniel B. Shank
Daniel B. Shank is a scholar working on Safety Research, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (13 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (11 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (8 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (7 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (5 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (328 citations), Health Informatics (35 citations), Information Systems and Management (112 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (276 citations) and Social Psychology (240 citations). Daniel B. Shank has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Patrick Gamez, Shelia R. Cotten, Sophia Rodriguez, Christopher Graves, R. W. McClendon, Gerrit Hoogenboom, Casey Canfield, Yoshihisa Kashima, William A. Anderson and Dawn T. Robinson. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Climatic Change, PLoS ONE and Sociological Forum.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.