Daniel B. Shank

49 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniel B. Shank
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Safety Research 313
  • Health Informatics 31
  • Information Systems and Management 109
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 262
  • Social Psychology 217
Replace Philip Brey with:
Philip Brey Netherlands
Henrik Skaug Sætra Norway
Noah Castelo Canada
Jenny L. Davis United States
Evan Selinger United States
Steven Umbrello Italy
Aleksandra Przegalińska Poland
Oliver Hauser United Kingdom
Jonathan Schulz United States
Pierre‐Majorique Léger Canada
Daniel B. Shank relative to Philip Brey Netherlands Philip Brey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Philip Brey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel B. Shank

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel B. Shank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel B. Shank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel B. Shank more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel B. Shank

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel B. Shank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel B. Shank. The network helps show where Daniel B. Shank may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel B. Shank, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel B. Shank Line = papers co-authored together Daniel B. Shank links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019172
2 2015142
3 2018102
4 201973
5 201363
6 200861
7 202050
8 201438
9 201332
10 202428
11 201825
12 201625
13 200824
14 202224
15 202123
16 202022
17 202022
18 202018
19 201216
20 202216

About Daniel B. Shank

Daniel B. Shank is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Safety Research and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (14 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (12 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (6 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (5 papers) and Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (313 citations), Health Informatics (31 citations), Information Systems and Management (109 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (262 citations) and Social Psychology (217 citations). Daniel B. Shank has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Patrick Gamez, Shelia R. Cotten, Christopher Graves, Sophia Rodriguez, R. W. McClendon, Gerrit Hoogenboom, Casey Canfield, Yoshihisa Kashima, William A. Anderson and Dawn T. Robinson. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, PLoS ONE, Climatic Change and Information Communication & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact