Daniel B. Rootman

2.9k citations
180 papers · 2.1k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel B. Rootman

161 papers receiving 2k citations

Peers

Daniel B. Rootman
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Ophthalmology 482
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 802
  • Dermatology 160
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 240
  • Neurology 145
Replace James C. Fleming with:
James C. Fleming United States
Bobby S. Korn United States
Gangadhara Sundar Singapore
Allan Edward Wulc United States
Allen M. Putterman United States
Kimberly Peele Cockerham United States
Peerooz Saeed Netherlands
Craig N. Czyz United States
Ali R. Sepahdari United States
Ilse Mombaerts Belgium
Daniel B. Rootman relative to James C. Fleming United States James C. Fleming's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
James C. Fleming · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel B. Rootman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel B. Rootman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel B. Rootman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel B. Rootman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel B. Rootman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel B. Rootman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel B. Rootman. The network helps show where Daniel B. Rootman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel B. Rootman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel B. Rootman Line = papers co-authored together Daniel B. Rootman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 180 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201290
2 201782
3 201472
4 201470
5 201566
6 201249
7 201248
8 201346
9 201144
10 202142
11 200739
12 201338
13 201438
14 201633
15 201432
16 202232
17 201131
18 201427
19 201226
20 201826

About Daniel B. Rootman

Daniel B. Rootman is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Ophthalmology, Dermatology, Surgery and Neurology, having authored 180 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (74 papers), Ocular Oncology and Treatments (19 papers), Vascular Malformations and Hemangiomas (15 papers), Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (12 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (10 papers), Ocular Disorders and Treatments (9 papers), Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (482 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (802 citations), Dermatology (160 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (240 citations) and Neurology (145 citations). Daniel B. Rootman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Robert A. Goldberg, Jack Rootman, Shoaib Ugradar, Justin N. Karlin, Catherine J. Hwang, David Samuel Rootman, Nariman Nassiri, Liza M. Cohen, Graham E. Trope and Kelsey A. Roelofs. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of Glaucoma and Eye.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact