Daniel Adams

49 papers receiving 765 citations

Peers

Daniel Adams
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 186
  • Health Informatics 9
  • General Materials Science 22
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 376
  • Mechanics of Materials 152
Replace T.W. Button with:
T.W. Button United Kingdom
H. Wilman United Kingdom
Б. И. Смирнов Russia
M.H. Hong Singapore
Qingsong Deng China
C. N. McCowan United States
Vilupanur A. Ravi United States
Katharine M. Flores United States
Takahisa Shobu Japan
Daniel Adams relative to T.W. Button United Kingdom T.W. Button's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
T.W. Button · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Adams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Adams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Adams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Adams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Adams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Adams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Adams. The network helps show where Daniel Adams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Adams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Adams Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Adams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999101
2 201396
3 200583
4 199667
5 198661
6 200656
7 199529
8 201624
9 200322
10 202119
11 198418
12 200117
13 199615
14 200414
15 199613
16 200713
17 202411
18 199811
19 201610
20 19939

About Daniel Adams

Daniel Adams is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Mechanics of Materials, Materials Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 51 papers that have together received 789 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Copper Interconnects and Reliability (22 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (21 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (8 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (7 papers), Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence (4 papers), Mechanical Behavior of Composites (3 papers), Thin-Film Transistor Technologies (3 papers) and Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (186 citations), Health Informatics (9 citations), General Materials Science (22 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (376 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (152 citations). Daniel Adams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include T. L. Alford, J. W. Mayer, B.A. Julies, Carl T. Herakovich, D. Knoesen, R. Pretoriüs, Hauk Han, Thomas Laursen, David Bowles and B. M. Ullrich. Their work appears in journals such as Thin Solid Films, Journal of Applied Physics, Scientific Reports, Materials Chemistry and Physics and Journal of the American College of Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact