Dana M. Johnson

71 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Dana M. Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Strategy and Management 295
  • Management Information Systems 166
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 182
  • Mechanics of Materials 377
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 136
Replace Robert Lundmark with:
Robert Lundmark Sweden
Jessica L. Heier Stamm United States
Mario D’Amico Italy
Kimberly L. Jensen United States
Wallace E. Tyner United States
Deborah O’Connell Australia
Joaquim José Martins Guilhoto Brazil
David Laborde United States
Zahra Shams Esfandabadi Italy
Mark Harvey United Kingdom
Dana M. Johnson relative to Robert Lundmark Sweden Robert Lundmark's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.8×
Robert Lundmark · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dana M. Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana M. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana M. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana M. Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana M. Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana M. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana M. Johnson. The network helps show where Dana M. Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dana M. Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dana M. Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Dana M. Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009207
2 2011167
3 201297
4 201588
5 201866
6 200660
7 201655
8 202348
9 201948
10 201643
11 200942
12 200739
13 201535
14 201831
15 201530
16 201830
17 200724
18 200424
19 201524
20 201623

About Dana M. Johnson

Dana M. Johnson is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Management Information Systems, Mechanics of Materials, Strategy and Management and Insect Science, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Contraception (19 papers), Quality and Supply Management (12 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (11 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (7 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (6 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (6 papers), Forest Management and Policy (6 papers) and Quality and Management Systems (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (295 citations), Management Information Systems (166 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (182 citations), Mechanics of Materials (377 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (136 citations). Dana M. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Fengli Zhang, Jinjiang Wang, John W. Sutherland, Abigail R.A. Aiken, Peter A. Larsen, Mark Johnson, Kathleen Broussard, Roberta S. Russell, Robert E. Froese and John Gershenson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Entomology, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health, Renewable Energy and Contraception.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact