Dan Sarooshi

495 citations
13 papers · 73 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Sarooshi

9 papers receiving 52 citations

Peers

Dan Sarooshi
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
  • Political Science and International Relations 68
  • Strategy and Management 17
  • Development 3
  • Sociology and Political Science 25
  • Law 5
Replace Stefan Oeter with:
Stefan Oeter Germany
Pierre Klein Belgium
Vera Gowlland‐Debbas Switzerland
Niels Blokker Netherlands
Ole Spiermann Denmark
Danesh Sarooshi United Kingdom
Brian D. Lepard United States
Emmanuel Decaux France
Régis Chemain France
Olufemi Elias United States
Dan Sarooshi relative to Stefan Oeter Germany Stefan Oeter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Stefan Oeter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Sarooshi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Sarooshi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Sarooshi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Sarooshi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Sarooshi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Sarooshi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Sarooshi. The network helps show where Dan Sarooshi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Dan Sarooshi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Sarooshi Line = papers co-authored together Dan Sarooshi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 200028
2
The Essentially Contested Nature of the Concept of Sovereignty: Implications for the Exercise by International Organizations of Delegated Powers of Government
200412
3
Issues of State Responsibility Before International Judicial Institutions
20049
4
Some preliminary remarks on the conferral by states of powers on international organizations
20035
5 20044
6 20044
7 20084
8
Investment Treaty Arbitration and the World Trade Organization: What Role for Systemic Values in the Resolution of International Economic Disputes?
20143
9 20043
10 20061
11 20130
12 20190
13 20050

About Dan Sarooshi

Dan Sarooshi is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Accounting, having authored 13 papers that have together received 73 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Law and Human Rights (8 papers), International Arbitration and Investment Law (7 papers), World Trade Organization Law (6 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (2 papers), International Law and Aviation (1 paper), Peacebuilding and International Security (1 paper), Taxation and Legal Issues (1 paper) and European Union Policy and Governance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (68 citations), Strategy and Management (17 citations), Development (3 citations), Sociology and Political Science (25 citations) and Law (5 citations). Dan Sarooshi has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Malgosia Fitzmaurice. Their work appears in journals such as International Organizations Law Review, European Journal of International Law, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Arbitration International and Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact