Dan O’Meara

18 papers receiving 367 citations

Peers

Dan O’Meara
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Anthropology 113
  • Law 107
  • Sociology and Political Science 375
  • Development 27
  • General Psychology 7
Replace Stanley Trapido with:
Stanley Trapido United Kingdom
Sheridan Johns United States
Bernard Magubane United States
Martin Legassick South Africa
Yash Ghai Hong Kong
Ruth First
Archie Mafeje Egypt
Jonathan Hyslop South Africa
Rupert Emerson United States
Jeanne Marie Penvenne United States
Dan O’Meara relative to Stanley Trapido United Kingdom Stanley Trapido's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Stanley Trapido · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan O’Meara

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan O’Meara's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan O’Meara with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan O’Meara more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan O’Meara

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan O’Meara. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan O’Meara. The network helps show where Dan O’Meara may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Dan O’Meara, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan O’Meara Line = papers co-authored together Dan O’Meara links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984181
2 199985
3 197662
4 198536
5
The Struggle for South Africa: A Reference Guide to Movements, Organizations and Institutions
198824
6 197523
7 197722
8 197615
9 198614
10 197811
11 198411
12
The collapse of Mozambican socialism
199110
13
The 1946 African Mine Workers' Strike in the political economy of South Africa
19758
14
Michaelis Pselli Philosophica minora
19896
15 19865
16 19845
17 20031
18 19841
19 19841
20 19850

About Dan O’Meara

Dan O’Meara is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Law, Political Science and International Relations and Ocean Engineering, having authored 22 papers that have together received 521 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include South African History and Culture (13 papers), African history and culture studies (8 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (4 papers), Leadership, Human Resources, Global Affairs (1 paper), Oil and Gas Production Techniques (1 paper), Global Politics and Economy (1 paper), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (1 paper) and International Development and Aid (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (113 citations), Law (107 citations), Sociology and Political Science (375 citations), Development (27 citations) and General Psychology (7 citations). Dan O’Meara has collaborated with scholars based in Mozambique, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Leonard Thompson, Robert Davies, Irving Hexham, Mike Morris, David Kaplan, Sipho Dlamini, Michael Psellus, Peter Walshe, Gregorio Cuerpo Caballero and John P. Castagna. Their work appears in journals such as Review of African Political Economy, The International Journal of African Historical Studies, Journal of Southern African Studies, The American Historical Review and Monthly Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact