Dan Geer

1.4k citations
57 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Geer

52 papers receiving 923 citations

Peers

Dan Geer
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Information Systems 600
  • Computer Networks and Communications 528
  • Signal Processing 243
  • Software 60
  • Artificial Intelligence 256
Replace Adam Shostack with:
Adam Shostack United States
Rayford B. Vaughn United States
Carsten Rudolph Germany
Pratyusa K. Manadhata United States
T. B. Richard Singapore
Basel Katt Norway
Shubhashis Sengupta India
Hannes Holm Sweden
Nobukazu Yoshioka Japan
Dimitri Van Landuyt Belgium
Dan Geer relative to Adam Shostack United States Adam Shostack's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Adam Shostack · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Geer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Geer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Geer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Geer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Geer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Geer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Geer. The network helps show where Dan Geer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Dan Geer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Geer Line = papers co-authored together Dan Geer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001166
2 200576
3 200372
4 200359
5 199857
6 200555
7 199851
8 200551
9 199045
10 200540
11 202035
12 200335
13 200634
14 200529
15 200128
16 200425
17 200420
18 200519
19 200618
20 200614

About Dan Geer

Dan Geer is a scholar working on Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, Signal Processing, Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems and Management, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Network Security and Intrusion Detection (13 papers), Information and Cyber Security (12 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (7 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (3 papers), Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (3 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (3 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (3 papers) and Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems (600 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (528 citations), Signal Processing (243 citations), Software (60 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (256 citations). Dan Geer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Bob Blakley, Aviel D. Rubin, Eric Jardine, John Speed Meyers, Dan Conway, Michel Chartrain, Beth Junker, Bertrand Meyer, Yong Wang and Paul A. J. Henricks. Their work appears in journals such as Computer, IEEE Security & Privacy, Queue, PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology and Communications of the ACM.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact