Dan Connell

724 citations
27 papers · 425 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Connell

26 papers receiving 317 citations

Peers

Dan Connell
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Gender Studies 116
  • Political Science and International Relations 165
  • Sociology and Political Science 257
  • Anthropology 43
  • Development 15
Replace Courtney Jung with:
Courtney Jung United States
Ifí Amadiume United Kingdom
Brenda Cossman Canada
Guy S. Goodwin‐Gill United Kingdom
Sara Koopman United States
Clive S. Kessler Australia
Patricia Uberoi India
Bárbara Sutton United States
Stacy K. McGoldrick United States
Nivedita Menon India
Dan Connell relative to Courtney Jung United States Courtney Jung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Courtney Jung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Connell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Connell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Connell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Connell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Connell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Connell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Connell. The network helps show where Dan Connell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Dan Connell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Connell Line = papers co-authored together Dan Connell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Gender and Power
2004181
2 199461
3 199739
4 200121
5 199421
6 199818
7 201116
8 199812
9 19799
10
Against all odds : a chronicle of the Eritrean revolution : with a new afterword on the postwar transition
19977
11 19955
12 19975
13 20165
14 20054
15
6 Eritrea and the United States: towards a new US policy
20093
16 19933
17 20032
18
Against more odds: the second siege of Eritrea
19992
19 20002
20 19962

About Dan Connell

Dan Connell is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 27 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African history and culture analysis (19 papers), African studies and sociopolitical issues (6 papers), African history and culture studies (4 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (3 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (2 papers), Middle East Politics and Society (1 paper), Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (1 paper) and Land Rights and Reforms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (116 citations), Political Science and International Relations (165 citations), Sociology and Political Science (257 citations), Anthropology (43 citations) and Development (15 citations). Dan Connell has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gail M. Gerhart, Basil Davidson, Lionel Cliffe, P. T. Speakman and E. V. Truter. Their work appears in journals such as Middle East Report, Review of African Political Economy, Monthly Review, Race & Class and Foreign Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact