Dale S. Wright

27 papers receiving 145 citations

Peers

Dale S. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Religious studies 56
  • Philosophy 59
  • Cultural Studies 36
  • Anthropology 25
  • Sociology and Political Science 106
Replace Julius Lipner with:
Julius Lipner United Kingdom
Karla F. C. Holloway United States
Emilie M. Townes United States
Peter Homans United States
James P. McDermott United States
Shelly Rambo United States
Jessica Berman United States
Vincent J. Cheng United States
Michael Berenbaum United States
Verity Smith United Kingdom
Dale S. Wright relative to Julius Lipner United Kingdom Julius Lipner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Julius Lipner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dale S. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dale S. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dale S. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dale S. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dale S. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dale S. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dale S. Wright. The network helps show where Dale S. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Dale S. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dale S. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Dale S. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199829
2 199227
3
The Kōan : texts and contexts in Zen Buddhism
200022
4 199619
5
Critical Questions Towards a Naturalized Concept of Karma in Buddhism
200416
6 199314
7 200913
8 19829
9
The Zen Canon: Understanding the Classic Texts
20048
10 20168
11
Zen ritual : studies of Zen Buddhist theory in practice
20077
12 20076
13 19926
14
Zen Classics: Formative Texts in the History of Zen Buddhism
20056
15 20096
16 20005
17 19935
18 20003
19
Theological Reflection and the Pursuit of Ideals: Theology, Human Flourishing and Freedom
20133
20 19931

About Dale S. Wright

Dale S. Wright is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Religious studies, Cultural Studies, Philosophy and Anthropology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 223 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (18 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (9 papers), Japanese History and Culture (7 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (2 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (1 paper) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (56 citations), Philosophy (59 citations), Cultural Studies (36 citations), Anthropology (25 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (106 citations). Dale S. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Steven Heine, Masao Abe, Florence M. Hofman, Xiaoling Li, David R. Hinton, Suraiya Rasheed, Andrea Kovacs, Peter Hayward, William J. Kovacs and Patrice M. Becker. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy East and West, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, History and Theory, The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal and Literature and Theology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact