D. Vohl

747 citations
20 papers · 88 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

D. Vohl

17 papers receiving 77 citations

Peers

D. Vohl
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 11
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 39
  • Instrumentation 8
  • Ecological Modeling 7
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 22
Replace G. Rixon with:
G. Rixon United Kingdom
Mélanie Beck United States
F. Tarsitano Switzerland
D. Zürcher Switzerland
A. C. Searle Australia
Hien Nguyen United States
S. Uno Japan
Sara Webb Australia
Conor Durkan United Kingdom
R. M. Candey United States
D. Vohl relative to G. Rixon United Kingdom G. Rixon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
G. Rixon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. Vohl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Vohl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Vohl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Vohl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Vohl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Vohl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Vohl. The network helps show where D. Vohl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. Vohl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. Vohl Line = papers co-authored together D. Vohl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
202112
2 201711
3 201610
4 20169
5 20245
6 20235
7 20155
8 20244
9 20174
10 20244
11 20234
12 20174
13 20253
14 20232
15
Shwirl: Meaningful coloring of spectral cube data with volume rendering
20172
16 20232
17 20161
18
Algorithmes de compression d'images hyperspectrales astrophysiques
20131
19 20250
20 20230

About D. Vohl

D. Vohl is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design and Computational Mechanics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 88 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data Visualization and Analytics (6 papers), Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology (5 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (4 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (3 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (3 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers), Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (2 papers) and Advanced Vision and Imaging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (11 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (39 citations), Instrumentation (8 citations), Ecological Modeling (7 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (22 citations). D. Vohl has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. van Leeuwen, Yogesh Maan, Christopher J. Fluke, G. Vernardos, Dave Kendal, Peter T. Green, David G. Barnes, Darren Croton, Tom Oosterloo and N. F. Bate. Their work appears in journals such as Astronomy and Astrophysics, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Astronomy and Computing and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact