D. Schams

223 papers receiving 6.5k citations

Peers

D. Schams
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 4.4k
  • Equine 335
  • Small Animals 937
  • Reproductive Medicine 881
  • Animal Science and Zoology 850
Replace William Hansel with:
William Hansel United States
Lawrence P. Reynolds United States
Dale A. Redmer United States
Stephen P. Ford United States
D.C. Wathes United Kingdom
A. P. F. Flint United Kingdom
R. J. Scaramuzzi United Kingdom
W.R. Butler United States
Terry M. Nett United States
G. E. Lamming United Kingdom
D. Schams relative to William Hansel United States William Hansel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
William Hansel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. Schams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Schams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Schams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Schams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Schams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Schams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Schams. The network helps show where D. Schams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. Schams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. Schams Line = papers co-authored together D. Schams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 234 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004193
2 1992190
3 2000173
4 1984134
5 1977131
6 1984130
7 2001101
8
Oxytocin determination by radioimmunoassay. III. Improvement to subpicogram sensitivity and application to blood levels in cyclic cattle.
198399
9 200598
10 199197
11 197497
12 200297
13 200496
14 199994
15 199793
16 197889
17
Endocrine patterns associated with puberty in male and female cattle.
198186
18 199284
19 200182
20 199081

About D. Schams

D. Schams is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Small Animals, Genetics and Social Psychology, having authored 234 papers that have together received 7.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (154 papers), Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (38 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (35 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (29 papers), Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (26 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (25 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (24 papers) and Reproductive System and Pregnancy (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (4.4k citations), Equine (335 citations), Small Animals (937 citations), Reproductive Medicine (881 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (850 citations). D. Schams has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bajram Berisha, H. Karg, E. Schallenberger, Akio Miyamoto, Ralf Einspanier, George A. Bubenik, Michaela Kosmann, Fred Sinowatz, Bernd Hoffmann and W. Amselgruber. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Endocrinology, Reproduction in Domestic Animals, Reproduction, Journal of Endocrinology and Theriogenology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact