D. Kling
Impact in
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 10%
- Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
-
- Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
Papers in
-
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes 11
- Heart Failure Treatment and Management 5
- Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors 4
- Surgery 16
- Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy 4
- Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques 3
- Co-authors
- G. Hempelmann (20 shared papers)Joachim Boldt (30 shared papers)Gunter Hempelmann (21 shared papers)B. v. Bormann (11 shared papers)Hans Heinrich Scheld (4 shared papers)A. Thiel (2 shared papers)Ulf Börner (3 shared papers)W. Russ (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon (3 papers)European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (1 paper)Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica (1 paper)Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology (1 paper)Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyBrazilUnited States
In The Last Decade
D. Kling
39 papers receiving 224 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 40
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 28
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 84
- Developmental Neuroscience 12
- Biochemistry 17
Countries citing papers authored by D. Kling
This map shows the geographic impact of D. Kling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Kling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Kling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. Kling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Kling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Kling. The network helps show where D. Kling may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. Kling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1988 | 27 | |
| 2 | 1988 | 21 | |
| 3 | 1987 | 20 | |
| 4 | [Calcium antagonists in anesthesia. Additive analgesia using nimodipine in heart surgery]. | 1985 | 17 |
| 5 | 1988 | 16 | |
| 6 | [Non-invasive versus invasive cardiovascular monitoring. Determination of stroke volume and pulmonary hydration using a new bioimpedance monitor]. | 1988 | 12 |
| 7 | [Comparative hemodynamic study of anesthesia induction with propofol (Diprivan), thiopental, methohexital, etomidate and midazolam in patients with coronary disease]. | 1987 | 10 |
| 8 | 1987 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 9 | |
| 10 | [Significance of endocrine parameters of stress]. | 1985 | 8 |
| 11 | 2000 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1986 | 8 | |
| 13 | [Preoperative normvolemic hemodilution in heart surgery. Pulmonary changes with the use of new technics]. | 1989 | 7 |
| 14 | Enhancement of myocardial energy potentials in man by glucose-insulin treatment before and after ischaemic heart arrest. | 1985 | 7 |
| 15 | [Haemodynamic effects and characteristics of midazolam during induction of anesthesia (author's transl)]. | 1981 | 6 |
| 16 | [Hemodynamic action profile of propofol in comparison with midazolam. A study in coronary surgical patients]. | 1987 | 6 |
| 17 | [Hemodynamic effects of the new phosphodiesterase inhibitor enoximone in heart surgery patients]. | 1989 | 5 |
| 18 | [The hemodynamic effects of a treatment with beta-receptor blockers during coronary surgery. A comparison between acebutolol and esmolol]. | 1990 | 5 |
| 19 | [Isolated modification of the vascular system by vasopressor agents (akrinor, etilefrin, ephedrine, norfenefrine, amezinium) during extracorporeal circulation in man]. | 1986 | 5 |
| 20 | [Effect of glucocorticoids on extravascular lung water following extra-corporeal circulation]. | 1986 | 4 |
About D. Kling
D. Kling is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Biochemistry and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 46 papers that have together received 261 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (11 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (6 papers), Blood transfusion and management (5 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (5 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (5 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (4 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (4 papers) and Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (40 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (28 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (84 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (12 citations) and Biochemistry (17 citations). D. Kling has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include G. Hempelmann, Joachim Boldt, Gunter Hempelmann, B. v. Bormann, Hans Heinrich Scheld, A. Thiel, Ulf Börner, W. Russ, Bernfried Zickmann and W. A. Stertmann. Their work appears in journals such as The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.