D. J. Conacher

631 citations
24 papers · 190 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Archeology top 5%
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies

Papers in

D. J. Conacher

17 papers receiving 107 citations

Peers

D. J. Conacher
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Anthropology 116
  • Archeology 36
  • Religious studies 17
  • Philosophy 34
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 13
Replace Anne Pippin Burnett with:
Anne Pippin Burnett United States
Seth L. Schein United States
Helen H. Bacon United States
Donald J. Mastronarde United States
David Bain United Kingdom
W. B. Stanford Ireland
James Diggle United States
Michael Lloyd Ireland
Bonnie MacLachlan Canada
Εὐριπίδης
D. J. Conacher relative to Anne Pippin Burnett United States Anne Pippin Burnett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Anne Pippin Burnett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. J. Conacher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. J. Conacher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. J. Conacher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. J. Conacher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. J. Conacher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. J. Conacher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. J. Conacher. The network helps show where D. J. Conacher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside D. J. Conacher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. J. Conacher Line = papers co-authored together D. J. Conacher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196746
2 196941
3 198929
4 198212
5 19689
6 19878
7 19817
8 20007
9 19745
10 19625
11 19974
12 19673
13
Theatre of Apollo: Divine Justice and Sophocles' 'Oedipus the King' by R. Drew-Griffith (review)
19972
14 19762
15
Aeschylus' Prometheus Bound
19802
16 19762
17 19832
18
Prometheus as Founder of the Arts
20041
19
From an Ancient to a Modern Theatre
19741
20 19771

About D. J. Conacher

D. J. Conacher is a scholar working on Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science, Organic Chemistry, Philosophy and Religious studies, having authored 24 papers that have together received 190 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (14 papers), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (5 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (5 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (4 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (3 papers), Families in Therapy and Culture (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers) and Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (116 citations), Archeology (36 citations), Religious studies (17 citations), Philosophy (34 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (13 citations). Frequent co-authors include Wesley D. Smith, Ann N. Michelini, C. J. Herington, Peter M. Smith, Richmond Lattimore and Hugh Lloyd-Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Phoenix, The American Journal of Philology, The Classical World, Classical Philology and University of Toronto Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact