D. J. Conacher
Impact in
- Anthropology top 5%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Historical and Literary Studies
- Archeology top 5%
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
Papers in
- Anthropology 15
- Classical Antiquity Studies 15
-
- Crime, Deviance, and Social Control 5
- Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Wesley D. Smith (1 shared paper)Ann N. Michelini (1 shared paper)C. J. Herington (1 shared paper)Richmond Lattimore (1 shared paper)Peter M. Smith (1 shared paper)G. S. Kirk (1 shared paper)Hugh Lloyd-Jones (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Phoenix (12 papers)The American Journal of Philology (3 papers)The Classical World (3 papers)Classical Philology (1 paper)University of Toronto Quarterly (2 papers)
In The Last Decade
D. J. Conacher
19 papers receiving 142 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Anthropology 162
- Archeology 55
- Religious studies 21
- Philosophy 43
- Classics 14
Countries citing papers authored by D. J. Conacher
This map shows the geographic impact of D. J. Conacher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. J. Conacher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. J. Conacher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. J. Conacher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. J. Conacher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. J. Conacher. The network helps show where D. J. Conacher may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside D. J. Conacher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1967 | 71 | |
| 2 | 1969 | 44 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 30 | |
| 4 | 1962 | 23 | |
| 5 | 1987 | 12 | |
| 6 | 1982 | 12 | |
| 7 | 1968 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1981 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1974 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1967 | 4 | |
| 13 | Theatre of Apollo: Divine Justice and Sophocles' 'Oedipus the King' by R. Drew-Griffith (review) | 1997 | 2 |
| 14 | 1976 | 2 | |
| 15 | Aeschylus' Prometheus Bound | 1980 | 2 |
| 16 | 1976 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1983 | 2 | |
| 18 | Prometheus as Founder of the Arts | 2004 | 1 |
| 19 | From an Ancient to a Modern Theatre | 1974 | 1 |
| 20 | 1977 | 1 |
About D. J. Conacher
D. J. Conacher is a scholar working on Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science, Organic Chemistry, Philosophy and Archeology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 252 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (15 papers), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (5 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (5 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (4 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (4 papers), Families in Therapy and Culture (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers) and Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (162 citations), Archeology (55 citations), Religious studies (21 citations), Philosophy (43 citations) and Classics (14 citations). Frequent co-authors include Wesley D. Smith, Ann N. Michelini, C. J. Herington, Richmond Lattimore, Peter M. Smith, G. S. Kirk and Hugh Lloyd-Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Phoenix, The American Journal of Philology, The Classical World, Classical Philology and University of Toronto Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.