D. Hammer
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 1%
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
-
- Mechanical and Optical Resonators
- Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Papers in
-
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 82
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 5
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 1
-
- Neutrino Physics Research 1
D. Hammer
82 papers receiving 9.8k citations
D. Hammer's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 8k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 983
- Artificial Intelligence 1k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 437
- Instrumentation 58
Countries citing papers authored by D. Hammer
This map shows the geographic impact of D. Hammer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Hammer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Hammer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. Hammer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Hammer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Hammer. The network helps show where D. Hammer may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Characterization of the LIGO detectors during their sixth science run Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 1126 |
| 2 | LIGO: the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 993 |
| 3 | Predictions for the rates of compact binary coalescences observable by ground-based gravitational-wave detectors Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 934 |
| 4 | Enhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 922 |
| 5 | A gravitational wave observatory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 724 |
| 6 | 2012 | 190 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 162 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 147 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 142 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 142 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 131 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 130 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 127 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 125 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 119 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 118 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 112 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 112 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 112 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 110 |
About D. Hammer
D. Hammer is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 82 papers that have together received 10k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (82 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (5 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (1 paper), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (1 paper) and Neutrino Physics Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (8k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (983 citations), Artificial Intelligence (1k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (437 citations) and Instrumentation (58 citations). D. Hammer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Classical and Quantum Gravity, Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series and Physical review. D.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.