D. E. Smith

55 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

D. E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
  • Pharmacy 526
  • Clinical Psychology 1.1k
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 329
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.2k
  • Applied Psychology 178
Replace Remy A. Hirasing with:
Remy A. Hirasing Netherlands
T. G. Lohman United States
A. Roche United States
Marta D. Van Loan United States
J. S. Garrow United Kingdom
Alexis Llewellyn United Kingdom
William Cameron Chumlea United States
WH Dietz United States
A.M. Fredriks Netherlands
James D. Leeper United States
D. E. Smith relative to Remy A. Hirasing Netherlands Remy A. Hirasing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Remy A. Hirasing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. E. Smith. The network helps show where D. E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together D. E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000376
2 1997280
3 1994232
4 1994203
5 1994180
6 1989150
7 1999148
8 1998146
9 1997142
10 199297
11 199685
12 198679
13 199275
14 199172
15 199766
16 199162
17
Correlates and predictors of weight loss in young adults: the CARDIA study.
199659
18 199856
19 198152
20 198742

About D. E. Smith

D. E. Smith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Pharmacy and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 57 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (14 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (12 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (6 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (5 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (3 papers) and Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (526 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (329 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.2k citations) and Applied Psychology (178 citations). D. E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Cora E. Lewis, G. Terence Wilson, Pamela J. Schreiner, Marsha D. Marcus, David R. Jacobs, O. Dale Williams, Polly Kratt, Barbara S. McCrady, Rena R. Wing and Catarina I. Kiefe. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Biology and Medicine, International Journal of Eating Disorders, American Journal of Epidemiology, Controlled Clinical Trials and Annals of Behavioral Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact