D. DʼEnterria
Impact in
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
- Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Particle Detector Development and Performance
- Neutrino Physics Research
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
-
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Papers in
-
- High-Energy Particle Collisions Research 9
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies 9
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions 6
- Particle Detector Development and Performance 3
- Neutrino Physics Research 1
- Journals
- Physics Letters B (8 papers)Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (1 paper)RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
D. DʼEnterria
10 papers receiving 695 citations
D. DʼEnterria's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 775
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 67
- Aerospace Engineering 25
- Statistics and Probability 7
- Applied Mathematics 7
Countries citing papers authored by D. DʼEnterria
This map shows the geographic impact of D. DʼEnterria's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. DʼEnterria with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. DʼEnterria more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. DʼEnterria
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. DʼEnterria. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. DʼEnterria. The network helps show where D. DʼEnterria may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Observation of long-range, near-side angular correlations in pPb collisions at the LHC Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 496 |
| 2 | 2012 | 54 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 53 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 49 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 47 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 33 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 24 | |
| 9 | Forward–backward asymmetry of Drell–Yan lepton pairs in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV | 2012 | 3 |
| 10 | Observation of long-range, near-side angular correlations in pPb collisions at the LHC | 2013 | 1 |
About D. DʼEnterria
D. DʼEnterria is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Insect Science, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 10 papers that have together received 789 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (9 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (9 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (6 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (3 papers) and Neutrino Physics Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (775 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (67 citations), Aerospace Engineering (25 citations), Statistics and Probability (7 citations) and Applied Mathematics (7 citations). D. DʼEnterria has collaborated with scholars based in Austria and Italy. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters B, Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) and RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.