C.W. Ford

796 citations
31 papers · 514 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

C.W. Ford

29 papers receiving 466 citations

Peers

C.W. Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 485
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 206
  • Museology 3
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 4
  • History 6
Replace G.L. Li with:
G.L. Li United States
D. Abakoumov Australia
Ki-Tae Jeong South Korea
B. Strebel Germany
C.-H. Lee South Korea
J. Berger Germany
H.J. Ehrke Germany
Hsu-Feng Chou United States
L. Zavargo-Peche Spain
C.C. Larsen Denmark
C.W. Ford relative to G.L. Li United States G.L. Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
G.L. Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.W. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.W. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.W. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.W. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.W. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.W. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.W. Ford. The network helps show where C.W. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.W. Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.W. Ford Line = papers co-authored together C.W. Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001168
2 199763
3 201050
4 199432
5 199631
6
Colourless 10Gb/s reflective SOA-EAM with low polarization sensitivity for long-reach DWDM-PON networks
200924
7 200218
8 199717
9 200512
10 200112
11 200211
12 200310
13 200910
14 19976
15 20086
16 19956
17 19895
18 19954
19
High Optical Output Power 10 Gbit/s and 40 Gbit/s Electroabsorption Modulators
20024
20 19974

About C.W. Ford

C.W. Ford is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Infectious Diseases, Sociology and Political Science and Computational Mechanics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 514 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical Network Technologies (18 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (17 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (13 papers), Advanced Photonic Communication Systems (12 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (4 papers), Advanced Optical Network Technologies (2 papers), Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design (2 papers) and Photography and Visual Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (485 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (206 citations), Museology (3 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (4 citations) and History (6 citations). C.W. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include D.G. Moodie, S.D. Perrin, I.F. Lealman, P. D. Townsend, L.J. Rivers, A.D. Ellis, L. Johnston, R. W. Moore, P. Healey and D. Nesset. Their work appears in journals such as Electronics Letters, Journal of Lightwave Technology, HIV Medicine, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics and IEEE Transactions on Components Packaging and Manufacturing Technology Part B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact