Cuthbert Dukes

3.4k citations
19 papers · 374 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Cuthbert Dukes

19 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers

Cuthbert Dukes
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 111
  • Genetics 130
  • Oncology 119
  • Gastroenterology 20
  • Epidemiology 124
Replace E G Muir with:
E G Muir United Kingdom
Robert W. Crichlow United States
Elizabeth Mussey United States
Weiland Lh United States
Pickren Jw
Hye‐Sook Chang South Korea
T Balestracci United States
Lafayette G. Owen United States
C.E.M. Blomjous Netherlands
Joseph J. Chanda United States
Cuthbert Dukes relative to E G Muir United Kingdom E G Muir's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
E G Muir · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cuthbert Dukes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cuthbert Dukes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cuthbert Dukes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cuthbert Dukes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cuthbert Dukes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cuthbert Dukes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cuthbert Dukes. The network helps show where Cuthbert Dukes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Cuthbert Dukes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cuthbert Dukes Line = papers co-authored together Cuthbert Dukes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 195298
2 195648
3
The surgical pathology of ulcerative colitis.
195447
4 195841
5 196230
6 198028
7 196022
8 195721
9
THE CONTROL OF PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS OF THE COLON AND RECTUM.
19648
10
Ancient Egyptian and Cnidian Medicine
19607
11 19595
12 19595
13 19603
14 19523
15
THE ORIGIN AND EARLY HISTORY OF THE IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND.
19652
16 19592
17 19572
18
Genetics in Relation to Surgery: A Historical Review: Thomas Vicary Lecture delivered at the Royal College of Surgeons of England on 27th October 1960.
19611
19 19531

About Cuthbert Dukes

Cuthbert Dukes is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Epidemiology and Genetics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (4 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (3 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (3 papers), Microscopic Colitis (3 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (2 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (1 paper) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (111 citations), Genetics (130 citations), Oncology (119 citations), Gastroenterology (20 citations) and Epidemiology (124 citations). Cuthbert Dukes has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include H E Lockhart-Mummery, H J R Bussey and B C Mitchley. Their work appears in journals such as Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, British journal of surgery, Medical History, The Lancet and British Journal of Urology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact