Curtis E. Beus

857 citations
10 papers · 622 · 1 hit paper · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Curtis E. Beus

10 papers receiving 528 citations

Curtis E. Beus's Hit Papers

Conventional versus Alternative Agriculture: The Paradigmatic Roots of the Debate* 1990 · 297 citations
2970+12+24Years since publication50100150200250

Peers

Curtis E. Beus
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 305
  • Environmental Chemistry 82
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 76
  • Plant Science 217
  • Safety Research 27
Replace Frederick L. Kirschenmann with:
Frederick L. Kirschenmann United States
Mark S. Paine Australia
Colin Anderson United Kingdom
Jet Proost Netherlands
Erika Rosenthal United States
Raymond A. Jussaume United States
Oliver Morgan United Kingdom
Pierre Gasselin France
Kenneth A. Dahlberg United States
Tom MacMillan United Kingdom
Curtis E. Beus relative to Frederick L. Kirschenmann United States Frederick L. Kirschenmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Frederick L. Kirschenmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Curtis E. Beus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Curtis E. Beus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Curtis E. Beus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Curtis E. Beus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Curtis E. Beus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Curtis E. Beus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Curtis E. Beus. The network helps show where Curtis E. Beus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Curtis E. Beus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Curtis E. Beus Line = papers co-authored together Curtis E. Beus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1
Conventional versus Alternative Agriculture: The Paradigmatic Roots of the Debate*
Hit paper breakdown →
1990297
2 199171
3 199259
4 199455
5 199352
6 199229
7 199426
8 199421
9 199310
10 19922

About Curtis E. Beus

Curtis E. Beus is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Plant Science, Environmental Chemistry and Safety Research, having authored 10 papers that have together received 622 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (5 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (4 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (3 papers), Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis (1 paper), Agricultural Economics and Policy (1 paper), Environmental Education and Sustainability (1 paper), Soil erosion and sediment transport (1 paper) and Risk Perception and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (305 citations), Environmental Chemistry (82 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (76 citations), Plant Science (217 citations) and Safety Research (27 citations). Curtis E. Beus has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Riley E. Dunlap and Don Andrew Dillman. Their work appears in journals such as Rural Sociology, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Journal of Consumer Affairs and Impact Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact