Craig E. Broeder

28 papers receiving 599 citations

Peers

Craig E. Broeder
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Rehabilitation 125
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 111
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 93
  • Physiology 192
  • Cell Biology 129
Replace Huey‐June Wu with:
Huey‐June Wu Taiwan
Fábio Lera Orsatti Brazil
Maurie J. Luetkemeier United States
Vic Ben‐Ezra United States
Robert Pritchett United States
Mousa Khalafi Iran
Vanessa Neves de Oliveira Brazil
Holden MacRae United States
Arthur Fernandes Gáspari Brazil
Håvard Nygaard Norway
Craig E. Broeder relative to Huey‐June Wu Taiwan Huey‐June Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Huey‐June Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Craig E. Broeder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Craig E. Broeder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig E. Broeder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig E. Broeder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Craig E. Broeder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig E. Broeder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig E. Broeder. The network helps show where Craig E. Broeder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Craig E. Broeder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Craig E. Broeder Line = papers co-authored together Craig E. Broeder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003145
2 200466
3 200959
4 199854
5 200347
6 199936
7 201334
8 200033
9 200429
10 199719
11 200317
12 200317
13 201215
14 199011
15 199111
16 202110
17 19899
18 20216
19 19986
20
Effect of Deer Antler Velvet on Aerobic, Anaerobic and Strength Performance
20154

About Craig E. Broeder

Craig E. Broeder is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Complementary and alternative medicine, Physiology, Cell Biology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 29 papers that have together received 639 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports Performance and Training (12 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (10 papers), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (5 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (5 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (4 papers), Winter Sports Injuries and Performance (3 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (3 papers) and Exercise and Physiological Responses (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (125 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (111 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (93 citations), Physiology (192 citations) and Cell Biology (129 citations). Craig E. Broeder has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Serbia. Frequent co-authors include John C. Quindry, Jeff H. King, William L. Stone, Lynn B. Panton, Michael Saunders, Amanda J. Salacinski, Jamie Golden, Frederic D. Seifer, Conrad P. Earnest and Jack H. Wilmore. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, The American Journal of Cardiology, European Journal of Applied Physiology, The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research and International journal of exercise science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact