Cosmin Safta

72 papers receiving 820 citations

Peers

Cosmin Safta
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 272
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 160
  • Computational Mechanics 281
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 90
  • Environmental Engineering 81
Replace Mohammad Khalil with:
Mohammad Khalil United States
Jaideep Ray United States
Marc Gerritsma Netherlands
Maria Rightley United States
Todd Oliver United States
Aashwin Mishra United States
Sai Hung Cheung Hong Kong
Xingjian Wang United States
M.‐D. Roselló Spain
M. Pilch United States
Cosmin Safta relative to Mohammad Khalil United States Mohammad Khalil's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Mohammad Khalil · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cosmin Safta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cosmin Safta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cosmin Safta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cosmin Safta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cosmin Safta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cosmin Safta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cosmin Safta. The network helps show where Cosmin Safta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cosmin Safta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cosmin Safta Line = papers co-authored together Cosmin Safta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013119
2 201365
3 201949
4 201640
5 201736
6 201735
7 201927
8 200526
9 201923
10 201522
11 201021
12 201220
13 201420
14 200617
15 202016
16 201416
17 201315
18 201614
19 200214
20 201814

About Cosmin Safta

Cosmin Safta is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Computational Mechanics, Artificial Intelligence, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 77 papers that have together received 849 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (27 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (12 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (11 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (11 papers), Model Reduction and Neural Networks (8 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (6 papers), Data-Driven Disease Surveillance (6 papers) and Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (272 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (160 citations), Computational Mechanics (281 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (90 citations) and Environmental Engineering (81 citations). Cosmin Safta has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Habib N. Najm, Khachik Sargsyan, Bert Debusschere, Daniel Ricciuto, Peter Thornton, Cyrus K. Madnia, Jaideep Ray, Xun Huan, Joseph Oefelein and Guilhem Lacaze. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computational Physics, Combustion Theory and Modelling, Combustion and Flame, PLoS ONE and SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact