Cosimo Posth
Impact in
- Paleontology top 2%
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Archeology top 0.5%
- Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Papers in
- Genetics 20
- Forensic and Genetic Research 19
- Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research 9
- Genetic diversity and population structure 7
- Archeology 14
- Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies 14
- Co-authors
- Johannes Krause (16 shared papers)Hervé Bocherens (4 shared papers)Christoph Wißing (3 shared papers)Choongwon Jeong (4 shared papers)Maria A. Spyrou (4 shared papers)Yu He (4 shared papers)Alexander Herbig (2 shared papers)Kirsten I. Bos (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Cosimo Posth
24 papers receiving 819 citations
Cosimo Posth's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Paleontology 343
- Archeology 386
- Anthropology 324
- Genetics 373
- Infectious Diseases 63
Countries citing papers authored by Cosimo Posth
This map shows the geographic impact of Cosimo Posth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cosimo Posth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cosimo Posth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cosimo Posth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cosimo Posth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cosimo Posth. The network helps show where Cosimo Posth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cosimo Posth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 148 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 142 | |
| 3 | Pleistocene North African genomes link Near Eastern and sub-Saharan African human populations Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 105 |
| 4 | 2021 | 76 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 62 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 61 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 57 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 54 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 4 |
About Cosimo Posth
Cosimo Posth is a scholar working on Genetics, Archeology, Paleontology, Anthropology and Ecology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 849 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic and Genetic Research (19 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (14 papers), Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (9 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (8 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (7 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (6 papers), Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (2 papers) and Zoonotic diseases and public health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (343 citations), Archeology (386 citations), Anthropology (324 citations), Genetics (373 citations) and Infectious Diseases (63 citations). Cosimo Posth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and France. Frequent co-authors include Johannes Krause, Hervé Bocherens, Christoph Wißing, Choongwon Jeong, Maria A. Spyrou, Yu He, Alexander Herbig, Kirsten I. Bos, Keiko Kitagawa and Luca Pagani. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Nature Communications, Nature Ecology & Evolution, Annals of Human Biology and Current Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.