Constanze Elfgen

28 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

Constanze Elfgen
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Cancer Research 75
  • Oncology 51
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 27
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 38
  • Clinical Psychology 21
Replace Carlie K. Thompson with:
Carlie K. Thompson United States
Elizabeth Blessing Elimimian United States
Nathalie LeVasseur Canada
Ko Un Park United States
Anne Hoyt United States
Thomas M. Deutsch Germany
Per-Henrik Zahl Norway
Asma Dilawari United States
Marcos Desídérío Ricci Brazil
Sanne ten Hoorn Netherlands
Constanze Elfgen relative to Carlie K. Thompson United States Carlie K. Thompson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Carlie K. Thompson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Constanze Elfgen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Constanze Elfgen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constanze Elfgen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constanze Elfgen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Constanze Elfgen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constanze Elfgen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constanze Elfgen. The network helps show where Constanze Elfgen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Constanze Elfgen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Constanze Elfgen Line = papers co-authored together Constanze Elfgen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201948
2 201732
3 201919
4 201919
5 202117
6 201915
7 202015
8 201914
9 202313
10 202212
11 202010
12 202010
13 20226
14 20196
15 20206
16 20215
17 20254
18 20194
19 20234
20 20233

About Constanze Elfgen

Constanze Elfgen is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Surgery, having authored 31 papers that have together received 273 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (10 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (5 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (3 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (2 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (2 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (1 paper) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (75 citations), Oncology (51 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (27 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (38 citations) and Clinical Psychology (21 citations). Constanze Elfgen has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Uwe Güth, Vesna Bjelic‐Radisic, Zsuzsanna Varga, Linda Moskovszky, Giacomo Montagna, Christoph Tausch, Emina Block, Bärbel Papassotiropoulos, Gisela Görres and Seraina Schmid. Their work appears in journals such as Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Breast Care, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, Psycho-Oncology and European Journal of Surgical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact