Conrad Chan
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Instrumentation top 10%
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Papers in
-
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 6
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 4
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 3
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 3
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 2
-
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena 3
- Neutrino Physics Research 2
- Co-authors
- Alexander Heger (7 shared papers)Bernhard Müller (6 shared papers)Volker Springel (1 shared paper)Projjwal Banerjee (1 shared paper)Yong-Zhong Qian (1 shared paper)J. Powell (1 shared paper)Thomas M. Tauris (1 shared paper)N. Langer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (4 papers)The Astrophysical Journal (3 papers)The Astrophysical Journal Letters (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Conrad Chan
9 papers receiving 430 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 434
- Instrumentation 60
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 162
- Radiation 4
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 5
Countries citing papers authored by Conrad Chan
This map shows the geographic impact of Conrad Chan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conrad Chan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conrad Chan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Conrad Chan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Conrad Chan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Conrad Chan. The network helps show where Conrad Chan may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Conrad Chan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 144 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 80 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 61 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 45 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 33 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 1 |
About Conrad Chan
Conrad Chan is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Instrumentation, Oceanography and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 461 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (6 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (4 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (3 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (3 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (3 papers), Neutrino Physics Research (2 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (2 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (434 citations), Instrumentation (60 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (162 citations), Radiation (4 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (5 citations). Conrad Chan has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Heger, Bernhard Müller, Volker Springel, Projjwal Banerjee, Yong-Zhong Qian, J. Powell, Thomas M. Tauris, N. Langer, Rüdiger Pakmor and Andrew R. Casey. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Astrophysical Journal and The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.