Cong Liang

673 citations
48 papers · 510 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Cong Liang

46 papers receiving 500 citations

Peers

Cong Liang
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Waste Management and Disposal 81
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 79
  • Automotive Engineering 72
  • Strategy and Management 89
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 34
Replace Divya Tiwari with:
Divya Tiwari United Kingdom
Lucas A. Hof Canada
Ali Doniavi Iran
Alexander Kaluza Germany
William D. Keat United States
Rob W. Andrews United States
Wai Sze Yip Hong Kong
Yuquan Meng United States
Alberto García Collado Spain
Honghao Zhang China
Cong Liang relative to Divya Tiwari United Kingdom Divya Tiwari's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Divya Tiwari · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cong Liang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cong Liang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cong Liang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cong Liang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cong Liang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cong Liang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cong Liang. The network helps show where Cong Liang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cong Liang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cong Liang Line = papers co-authored together Cong Liang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201759
2 201854
3 202339
4 202038
5 201935
6 201925
7 202420
8 202120
9 202216
10 201516
11 201813
12 202413
13 201712
14 202212
15 202111
16 202310
17 20239
18 20179
19 20228
20 20238

About Cong Liang

Cong Liang is a scholar working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Automotive Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 48 papers that have together received 510 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Manufacturing Process and Optimization (9 papers), Extraction and Separation Processes (6 papers), Advanced Battery Technologies Research (5 papers), High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena (5 papers), Recycling and Waste Management Techniques (4 papers), Sustainable Supply Chain Management (4 papers), Vacuum and Plasma Arcs (4 papers) and Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Waste Management and Disposal (81 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (79 citations), Automotive Engineering (72 citations), Strategy and Management (89 citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (34 citations). Cong Liang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Fu Zhao, John W. Sutherland, Jinliang Xu, Jian Xie, Haixia Zhang, Wei-wei Liu, Wenxiao Li, Wanhua Wang, Mohamed‐Slim Alouini and Yelin Deng. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Journal of Cleaner Production, Electronics, Journal of Mechanical Design and Chemical Engineering Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact