Cong Chen

37 papers receiving 365 citations

Peers

Cong Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Statistics and Probability 184
  • Management Science and Operations Research 81
  • Cancer Research 50
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 15
  • Oncology 46
Replace Hsi‐Guang Sung with:
Hsi‐Guang Sung United States
NM Hylton United States
Kyung Mann Kim United States
Gautier Paux France
Heng Zhou United States
Thomas Gwise United States
Emmanuel Zuber Switzerland
Zhenzhen Xu United States
Zoran Antonijevic United States
David Dejardin Belgium
Cong Chen relative to Hsi‐Guang Sung United States Hsi‐Guang Sung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×13.5×
Hsi‐Guang Sung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cong Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cong Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cong Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cong Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cong Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cong Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cong Chen. The network helps show where Cong Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cong Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cong Chen Line = papers co-authored together Cong Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201742
2 201438
3 201636
4 202032
5 201326
6 202018
7 202017
8 201916
9 202116
10 201712
11 201711
12 201810
13 20219
14 20209
15 20139
16 20197
17 20027
18 20186
19 20065
20 20215

About Cong Chen

Cong Chen is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Management Science and Operations Research, Immunology, Molecular Biology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (29 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (15 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers), Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (6 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (3 papers), Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth (3 papers) and Gene expression and cancer classification (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (184 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (81 citations), Cancer Research (50 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (15 citations) and Oncology (46 citations). Cong Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Linda Sun, Xiaoyun Li, Eric H. Rubin, Heng Zhou, Robert A. Beckman, Archie Tse, Devan V. Mehrotra, Cai Wu, Keaven M. Anderson and Nan Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Clinical Trials, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, Statistics in Medicine, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics and Pharmaceutical Statistics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact