Colin Egerer

497 citations
12 papers · 358 · h-index 11

Impact in

    • Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
    • Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
    • High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
    • Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
    • Nuclear physics research studies

Papers in

Colin Egerer

12 papers receiving 358 citations

Peers

Colin Egerer
Comparison fields: 5 of 8
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 343
  • Finance 1
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 3
  • Condensed Matter Physics 1
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 1
Replace S. Prakash with:
S. Prakash India
P. Starovoitov Germany
H. L. Jiang China
M. A. Donnellan United Kingdom
A. Liptaj Slovakia
J. Breitweg United States
K. Semenov-Tian-Shansky France
Jen-Chieh Peng Taiwan
N. Soni India
Allen Cris John Rubesh Rajan United States
Colin Egerer relative to S. Prakash India S. Prakash's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×27×
S. Prakash · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Colin Egerer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Colin Egerer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colin Egerer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colin Egerer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Colin Egerer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colin Egerer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colin Egerer. The network helps show where Colin Egerer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Colin Egerer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Colin Egerer Line = papers co-authored together Colin Egerer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2019100
2 202069
3 202138
4 202126
5 202126
6 202226
7 202220
8 202415
9 202114
10 202312
11 201911
12
Pion Valence Quark Distribution at Large $x$ from Lattice QCD
20201

About Colin Egerer

Colin Egerer is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry, Surgery and Communication, having authored 12 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (12 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (12 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (343 citations), Finance (1 citation), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (3 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (1 citation) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (1 citation). Colin Egerer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include David Richards, Kostas Orginos, Joseph Karpie, Raza Sabbir Sufian, Jian-Wei Qiu, Robert G. Edwards, Savvas Zafeiropoulos, Bálint Joó, Anatoly Radyushkin and Eloy Romero. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. D, Journal of High Energy Physics and arXiv (Cornell University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact