Cody Marrs

425 citations
14 papers · 43 · h-index 4

Impact in

    • Literature: history, themes, analysis
    • American and British Literature Analysis
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism
    • Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism

Papers in

    • Literature: history, themes, analysis 6
    • American and British Literature Analysis 4
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism 4
    • Short Stories in Global Literature 2
    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 2
    • Environmental, Ecological, and Cultural Studies 1
    • Canadian Identity and History 1

Cody Marrs

7 papers receiving 11 citations

Peers

Cody Marrs
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
  • Literature and Literary Theory 26
  • History 6
  • Marketing 5
  • Anthropology 5
  • Sociology and Political Science 14
Replace Jonathan Veitch with:
Jonathan Veitch
Frances Milton Trollope
Monika Schmitz‐Emans Germany
Robert Hampson United Kingdom
Lucy Collins Ireland
Maryemma Graham United States
Kristin Bluemel United States
Elizabeth Renker United States
William Henry Maloney Christie Australia
Bertrand Westphal France
Cody Marrs relative to Jonathan Veitch Jonathan Veitch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jonathan Veitch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cody Marrs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cody Marrs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cody Marrs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cody Marrs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cody Marrs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cody Marrs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cody Marrs. The network helps show where Cody Marrs may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201511
2 201310
3 20108
4 20185
5 20133
6 20112
7 20202
8 20181
9 20161
10 20230
11 20230
12 20110
13 20190
14 20170

About Cody Marrs

Cody Marrs is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Anthropology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 43 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literature: history, themes, analysis (6 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (4 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (4 papers), Short Stories in Global Literature (2 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (2 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers), Environmental, Ecological, and Cultural Studies (1 paper) and Canadian Identity and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (26 citations), History (6 citations), Marketing (5 citations), Anthropology (5 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (14 citations). Cody Marrs has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Their work appears in journals such as American Literature, Leviathan, American Literary Realism, American Literary History and Arizona quarterly/˜The œArizona quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact