Cock Lodder

1.2k citations
35 papers · 906 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Cock Lodder

34 papers receiving 881 citations

Peers

Cock Lodder
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 219
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 532
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 234
  • Condensed Matter Physics 115
  • Structural Biology 9
Replace S. Baba with:
S. Baba Japan
Y. E. Strausser United States
S. Landis France
G.-C. Wang United States
A. J. Pidduck United Kingdom
Christophe Péroz United States
T-M Lu United States
R. L. Hengehold United States
H. Feil Netherlands
Mufei Xiao Mexico
Cock Lodder relative to S. Baba Japan S. Baba's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
S. Baba · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cock Lodder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cock Lodder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cock Lodder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cock Lodder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cock Lodder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cock Lodder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cock Lodder. The network helps show where Cock Lodder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cock Lodder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cock Lodder Line = papers co-authored together Cock Lodder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997291
2 2006153
3 1994127
4 199896
5 199836
6 199127
7 200018
8 199116
9 199415
10 199815
11 200212
12 200012
13 19879
14 19948
15 19948
16 19888
17 19997
18 19936
19 19935
20 19945

About Cock Lodder

Cock Lodder is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Condensed Matter Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 35 papers that have together received 906 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (23 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (12 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (8 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Near-Field Optical Microscopy (6 papers), nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (6 papers), Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications (4 papers) and Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surfaces, Coatings and Films (219 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (532 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (234 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (115 citations) and Structural Biology (9 citations). Cock Lodder has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Léon Abelmann, Steffen Porthun, K. Motohashi, Byoung‐Chul Min, R. Jansen, T.J.A. Popma, H. van Kranenburg, James A. Bain, S.B. Luitjens and Koji Takei. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Journal of Applied Physics, Materials Science and Engineering R Reports and Nature Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact