C.M. Knop

401 citations
44 papers · 318 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

C.M. Knop

41 papers receiving 247 citations

Peers

C.M. Knop
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Aerospace Engineering 154
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 140
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 223
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 52
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 20
Replace V. Glaude with:
V. Glaude Canada
M. Pereyaslavets Japan
G.A. Morin Canada
G. Warren United States
HC Minnett Australia
R.L. Eisenhart United States
D. A. Watkins United States
L. Accatino Italy
E. Chiaveri Switzerland
S. Kheifets United States
C.M. Knop relative to V. Glaude Canada V. Glaude's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
V. Glaude · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.M. Knop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.M. Knop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.M. Knop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.M. Knop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.M. Knop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.M. Knop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.M. Knop. The network helps show where C.M. Knop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside C.M. Knop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.M. Knop Line = papers co-authored together C.M. Knop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196444
2 196829
3 196322
4 196122
5 198620
6 197618
7 196417
8 197016
9 197214
10 199512
11 197510
12 19679
13 19868
14 19657
15 19726
16 19775
17 19645
18 19665
19 19665
20 19964

About C.M. Knop

C.M. Knop is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Computational Mechanics, having authored 44 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements (11 papers), Antenna Design and Analysis (10 papers), Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (9 papers), Microwave Engineering and Waveguides (9 papers), Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research (7 papers), Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies (5 papers), Antenna Design and Optimization (5 papers) and Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aerospace Engineering (154 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (140 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (223 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (52 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (20 citations). C.M. Knop has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ukraine and China. Frequent co-authors include Edwin Ostertag, W. Croswell, C.T. Swift, H. Hodara, Antonio Battista, You‐Feng Cheng and J.R. Wait. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the IEEE, Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility and IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact