Cleo Keppens

26 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers

Cleo Keppens
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Cancer Research 214
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 70
  • Oncology 100
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 111
  • Statistics and Probability 23
Replace Qingxiang Yan with:
Qingxiang Yan United States
Jamie N. Holloway United States
Allen C. Nunnally United States
T. Kouno Japan
Alexander J. Vickers United Kingdom
Chacha Horombe United States
Mario Lamping Germany
Ramón Lobato-Busto Spain
H. Ballentine Carter United States
Massimo Gion Italy
Cleo Keppens relative to Qingxiang Yan United States Qingxiang Yan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Qingxiang Yan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cleo Keppens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cleo Keppens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cleo Keppens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cleo Keppens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cleo Keppens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cleo Keppens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cleo Keppens. The network helps show where Cleo Keppens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cleo Keppens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cleo Keppens Line = papers co-authored together Cleo Keppens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201842
2 201837
3 201936
4 202025
5 201824
6 201824
7 201722
8 201622
9 201821
10 202016
11 201812
12 201911
13 201510
14 20208
15 20207
16 20206
17 20204
18 20214
19 20213
20 20173

About Cleo Keppens

Cleo Keppens is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 26 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (19 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (9 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (7 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (5 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (4 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (2 papers) and Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (214 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (70 citations), Oncology (100 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (111 citations) and Statistics and Probability (23 citations). Cleo Keppens has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Els M.C. Dequeker, Ed M. D. Schuuring, Nicola Normanno, Simon J. Patton, Patrick Pauwels, Zandra C. Deans, Rachel Butler, Jacqueline A. Hall, J. Han van Krieken and Francesca Fenizia. Their work appears in journals such as Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin, Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, BMC Cancer, Journal of Thoracic Oncology and Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact