Clemente Galdi

60 papers receiving 493 citations

Peers

Clemente Galdi
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Signal Processing 125
  • Information Systems 248
  • Management Science and Operations Research 97
  • Computer Networks and Communications 171
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 70
Replace Keishi Tajima with:
Keishi Tajima Japan
Simon Dooms Belgium
Gengxin Miao United States
Paul‐Alexandru Chirita Germany
Liyun Ru China
Bhaskar Mehta Germany
Russell Swan United States
Vinay Setty Norway
Kenneth Wai-Ting Leung Hong Kong
Clemente Galdi relative to Keishi Tajima Japan Keishi Tajima's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Keishi Tajima · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clemente Galdi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clemente Galdi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clemente Galdi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clemente Galdi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clemente Galdi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clemente Galdi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clemente Galdi. The network helps show where Clemente Galdi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clemente Galdi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clemente Galdi Line = papers co-authored together Clemente Galdi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201536
2 200632
3 201422
4 200821
5 201318
6 200518
7 201718
8 200318
9 201417
10
Generalized discrete preference games
201616
11 201016
12 201815
13 201714
14 201514
15 201712
16 202312
17 201111
18 201611
19 201411
20 200811

About Clemente Galdi

Clemente Galdi is a scholar working on Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, Signal Processing, Artificial Intelligence and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 63 papers that have together received 506 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cryptography and Data Security (19 papers), User Authentication and Security Systems (17 papers), Advanced Authentication Protocols Security (12 papers), Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (11 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (9 papers), Security and Verification in Computing (7 papers), Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs (7 papers) and Game Theory and Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (125 citations), Information Systems (248 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (97 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (171 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (70 citations). Clemente Galdi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Greece and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Luigi Catuogno, Giuseppe Persiano, Ioannis Caragiannis, Piero A. Bonatti, Diodato Ferraioli, Vincenzo Auletta, Alfredo De Santis, Paolo D’Arco, Giovanni Di Crescenzo and Carlo Blundo. Their work appears in journals such as Lecture notes in computer science, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, International Journal of Information Security and Journal of Computer Security.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact