Clelia Malighetti

21 papers receiving 378 citations

Peers

Clelia Malighetti
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Human-Computer Interaction 120
  • Clinical Psychology 132
  • Applied Psychology 25
  • Rehabilitation 23
  • Social Psychology 76
Replace Alexander De Foe with:
Alexander De Foe Australia
James Collett Australia
Sara Ventura Italy
Sophie Côté Canada
Johanna Xenia Kafka Austria
Helene S. Wallach Israel
Poppy Brown United Kingdom
Hilary L. Copp United States
Patrick Légeron France
Tanya Guitard Canada
Clelia Malighetti relative to Alexander De Foe Australia Alexander De Foe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Alexander De Foe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clelia Malighetti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clelia Malighetti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clelia Malighetti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clelia Malighetti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clelia Malighetti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clelia Malighetti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clelia Malighetti. The network helps show where Clelia Malighetti may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clelia Malighetti, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clelia Malighetti Line = papers co-authored together Clelia Malighetti links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202162
2 202161
3 202139
4 202033
5 202032
6 201717
7 202216
8 202316
9 202015
10 202114
11 202113
12 202210
13 202010
14 20189
15
Inside and outside the self. Virtual reality and repertory grids in the spatial analysis of anorexic patients’ meanings
20168
16
#Eating disorders and Instagram: What emotions do you express?
20208
17 20247
18 20205
19 20235
20 20224

About Clelia Malighetti

Clelia Malighetti is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 386 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (9 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (6 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (4 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), AI in Service Interactions (2 papers) and Cognitive and psychological constructs research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (120 citations), Clinical Psychology (132 citations), Applied Psychology (25 citations), Rehabilitation (23 citations) and Social Psychology (76 citations). Clelia Malighetti has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Giuseppe Riva, Silvia Serino, Marta Matamala-Gomez, Fabrizia Mantovani, Olivia Realdon, Sabrina Cipolletta, Antonella Maselli, Daniele Di Lernia, Elisa Pedroli and Andrea Spoto. Their work appears in journals such as Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, Journal of Clinical Medicine, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Psychiatry Research and Virtual Reality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact