Claudio Sacks
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Papers in
-
- Acute Ischemic Stroke Management 6
-
- Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases 3
- Co-authors
- Pablo M. Lavados (6 shared papers)Rodrigo Salinas (4 shared papers)Marcelo Gálvez (3 shared papers)Walter Feuerhake (3 shared papers)Gonzalo Álvarez (3 shared papers)Fernando Araya (3 shared papers)Arnold Hoppe (2 shared papers)Liliana Jadue (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Lancet Neurology (2 papers)Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases (2 papers)Neuroepidemiology (1 paper)The Lancet Global Health (1 paper)The Lancet (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- ChileUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Claudio Sacks
8 papers receiving 530 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Rehabilitation 89
- Epidemiology 281
- Neurology 85
- Internal Medicine 19
- Neurology 34
Countries citing papers authored by Claudio Sacks
This map shows the geographic impact of Claudio Sacks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudio Sacks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudio Sacks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Claudio Sacks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudio Sacks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudio Sacks. The network helps show where Claudio Sacks may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Claudio Sacks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 201 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 190 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 65 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 55 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 9 | [Wernicke's encephalopathy and dialysis: report of two cases]. | 1997 | 0 |
About Claudio Sacks
Claudio Sacks is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Neurology, Rehabilitation and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 552 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (6 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (3 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper), Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research (1 paper), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1 paper), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (1 paper) and Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (89 citations), Epidemiology (281 citations), Neurology (85 citations), Internal Medicine (19 citations) and Neurology (34 citations). Claudio Sacks has collaborated with scholars based in Chile, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Pablo M. Lavados, Rodrigo Salinas, Marcelo Gálvez, Walter Feuerhake, Gonzalo Álvarez, Fernando Araya, Arnold Hoppe, Liliana Jadue, Jefferson Gomes Fernandes and Marco T. Medina. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet Neurology, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, Neuroepidemiology, The Lancet Global Health and The Lancet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.