Claudia Drees
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 2%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies 18
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 19
- Co-authors
- Thorsten Aßmann (33 shared papers)Katharina Homburg (9 shared papers)Andrea Matern (15 shared papers)Wiebke Schuett (11 shared papers)Petra Dieker (4 shared papers)Werner Härdtle (10 shared papers)Martin M. Goßner (3 shared papers)Andreas Schuldt (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- ZooKeys (6 papers)Conservation Genetics (4 papers)PeerJ (3 papers)Journal of Insect Conservation (3 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomIsrael
In The Last Decade
Claudia Drees
42 papers receiving 732 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Ecological Modeling 210
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 274
- Insect Science 266
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 357
- Ecology 298
Countries citing papers authored by Claudia Drees
This map shows the geographic impact of Claudia Drees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudia Drees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudia Drees more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Claudia Drees
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudia Drees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudia Drees. The network helps show where Claudia Drees may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Claudia Drees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 91 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 47 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 45 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 31 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 31 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 25 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 24 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 23 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 13 |
About Claudia Drees
Claudia Drees is a scholar working on Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecological Modeling, having authored 48 papers that have together received 756 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (19 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (18 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (14 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (10 papers), Plant and animal studies (9 papers), Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution (7 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (6 papers) and Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (210 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (274 citations), Insect Science (266 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (357 citations) and Ecology (298 citations). Claudia Drees has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Thorsten Aßmann, Katharina Homburg, Andrea Matern, Wiebke Schuett, Petra Dieker, Werner Härdtle, Martin M. Goßner, Andreas Schuldt, Eick von Ruschkowski and Hartmut Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as ZooKeys, Conservation Genetics, PeerJ, Journal of Insect Conservation and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.