Claudia Drees
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 2%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies 19
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 19
- Co-authors
- Thorsten Aßmann (40 shared papers)Andrea Matern (19 shared papers)Katharina Homburg (10 shared papers)Wiebke Schuett (10 shared papers)Jan Christian Habel (6 shared papers)Andreas Schuldt (6 shared papers)Petra Dieker (5 shared papers)Martin M. Goßner (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- ZooKeys (9 papers)Conservation Genetics (4 papers)Journal of Insect Conservation (3 papers)PeerJ (3 papers)Biological Conservation (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomIsrael
In The Last Decade
Claudia Drees
47 papers receiving 873 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Ecological Modeling 258
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 311
- Insect Science 309
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 422
- Ecology 340
Countries citing papers authored by Claudia Drees
This map shows the geographic impact of Claudia Drees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudia Drees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudia Drees more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Claudia Drees
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudia Drees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudia Drees. The network helps show where Claudia Drees may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Claudia Drees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 101 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 79 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 49 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 46 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 42 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 34 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 34 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 34 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 32 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 29 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 28 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 24 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 24 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 21 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 20 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 19 |
About Claudia Drees
Claudia Drees is a scholar working on Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology, having authored 54 papers that have together received 911 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (19 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (19 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (14 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (10 papers), Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution (9 papers), Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (8 papers) and Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (258 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (311 citations), Insect Science (309 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (422 citations) and Ecology (340 citations). Claudia Drees has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Thorsten Aßmann, Andrea Matern, Katharina Homburg, Wiebke Schuett, Jan Christian Habel, Andreas Schuldt, Petra Dieker, Martin M. Goßner, Werner Härdtle and Eick von Ruschkowski. Their work appears in journals such as ZooKeys, Conservation Genetics, Journal of Insect Conservation, PeerJ and Biological Conservation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.