C.L. Morgan

685 citations
34 papers · 368 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

C.L. Morgan

34 papers receiving 321 citations

Peers

C.L. Morgan
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 150
  • Paleontology 75
  • Animal Science and Zoology 89
  • Atmospheric Science 62
  • Geophysics 42
Replace Masao Kametaka with:
Masao Kametaka Japan
Muhammad Riaz Pakistan
A. Kassab Egypt
Christina Heller Germany
Mariana Cagnoni Argentina
Dean M Peterson Hungary
Zulfiqar Ahmed Pakistan
Kazuhisa Takeuchi Japan
A Fernández Spain
Xueqin Zhao China
C.L. Morgan relative to Masao Kametaka Japan Masao Kametaka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Masao Kametaka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.L. Morgan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.L. Morgan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.L. Morgan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.L. Morgan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.L. Morgan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.L. Morgan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.L. Morgan. The network helps show where C.L. Morgan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.L. Morgan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.L. Morgan Line = papers co-authored together C.L. Morgan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200447
2 200038
3 196136
4 199935
5 197530
6 199018
7 195617
8 199317
9 195716
10 199812
11 20019
12 19868
13 19578
14 19537
15 19617
16 19597
17 19575
18 19875
19 19545
20 19944

About C.L. Morgan

C.L. Morgan is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Geochemistry and Petrology, Paleontology, Microbiology and Plant Science, having authored 34 papers that have together received 368 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (12 papers), Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (11 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (5 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (5 papers), Coccidia and coccidiosis research (4 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (3 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (2 papers) and Livestock and Poultry Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geochemistry and Petrology (150 citations), Paleontology (75 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (89 citations), Atmospheric Science (62 citations) and Geophysics (42 citations). C.L. Morgan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include James R. Hein, Edward C. Naber, B.D. Barnett, D.S. Cronan, Philomène Verlaan, S.P. Touchburn, George T. Baker, Kwang Seob Jeong, Haewon Jung and K. E. Schaefer. Their work appears in journals such as Poultry Science, Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, Marine Geology, Avian Diseases and New Zealand Veterinary Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact