C.J. Murphy

559 citations
17 papers · 449 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

C.J. Murphy

16 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers

C.J. Murphy
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Cell Biology 109
  • Ophthalmology 52
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 133
  • Immunology and Allergy 27
  • Biomaterials 46
Replace Jorge H. Torres with:
Jorge H. Torres United States
Stéphanie Wong United States
Gaël Latour France
Wei‐Liang Chen Taiwan
Kong Yong Then Malaysia
Gregory R. Wohl Canada
Ivan Gusachenko France
Christina S. Kamma‐Lorger Spain
Joely Kaufman United States
Noël Ziebarth United States
C.J. Murphy relative to Jorge H. Torres United States Jorge H. Torres's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Jorge H. Torres · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.J. Murphy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.J. Murphy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.J. Murphy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.J. Murphy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.J. Murphy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.J. Murphy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.J. Murphy. The network helps show where C.J. Murphy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.J. Murphy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.J. Murphy Line = papers co-authored together C.J. Murphy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2009190
2 201076
3 201453
4 201147
5 201425
6 201523
7 198912
8 20077
9 20074
10 20133
11 20102
12 20122
13 20092
14 20091
15 20081
16 20051
17 20250

About C.J. Murphy

C.J. Murphy is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Cell Biology, Aerospace Engineering and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 449 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Superconducting Materials and Applications (8 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (5 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (5 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (4 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (3 papers), Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research (3 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (109 citations), Ophthalmology (52 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (133 citations), Immunology and Allergy (27 citations) and Biomaterials (46 citations). C.J. Murphy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and China. Frequent co-authors include Paul F. Nealey, Julie A. Last, Sara J. Liliensiek, Paul Russell, Vijay Krishna Raghunathan, Joshua T. Morgan, Clayton T. McKee, Sara M. Thomasy, Kathryn L. Good and Philip H. Kass. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Ophthalmology, BioTechniques, Biomaterials, Fusion Science & Technology and Fusion Engineering and Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact