CJ Getty
Impact in
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
- Surgery top 10%
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
- Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Papers in
- Surgery 7
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 3
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 3
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 2
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 2
- Orthopedic Infections and Treatments 2
- Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques 1
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 2
- Co-authors
- I Stockley (3 shared papers)David Stanley (1 shared paper)J R Johnson (2 shared papers)T. Duckworth (1 shared paper)M Glasgow (1 shared paper)Shlomo Wientroub (1 shared paper)I. Gordon (1 shared paper)J. A. Fixsen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIsrael
In The Last Decade
CJ Getty
8 papers receiving 398 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 141
- Surgery 278
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 50
- Pharmacology 65
- Developmental Biology 7
Countries citing papers authored by CJ Getty
This map shows the geographic impact of CJ Getty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by CJ Getty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CJ Getty more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by CJ Getty
This network shows the impact of papers produced by CJ Getty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by CJ Getty. The network helps show where CJ Getty may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside CJ Getty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1980 | 80 | |
| 2 | 1990 | 70 | |
| 3 | 1981 | 69 | |
| 4 | 1992 | 59 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 58 | |
| 6 | 1990 | 53 | |
| 7 | 1983 | 19 | |
| 8 | 1984 | 17 |
About CJ Getty
CJ Getty is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Rehabilitation, Epidemiology and Rheumatology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (3 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (3 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (2 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (2 papers), Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (1 paper) and Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (141 citations), Surgery (278 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (50 citations), Pharmacology (65 citations) and Developmental Biology (7 citations). CJ Getty has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include I Stockley, David Stanley, J R Johnson, T. Duckworth, M Glasgow, Shlomo Wientroub, I. Gordon, J. A. Fixsen and Lloyd B. Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.