C.J. Densham
Impact in
-
- Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
- Particle Detector Development and Performance
-
- Nuclear Physics and Applications
Papers in
-
- Particle accelerators and beam dynamics 6
- Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies 2
-
- Nuclear Physics and Applications 3
- Co-authors
- Thomas W. Davies (2 shared papers)O. Caretta (3 shared papers)E. Holtom (4 shared papers)T. Davenne (2 shared papers)Jonathan Mark Butterworth (4 shared papers)D.E. Baynham (5 shared papers)P. Loveridge (3 shared papers)F.S. Carr (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity (5 papers)Journal of Nuclear Materials (3 papers)Powder Technology (1 paper)Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsFrance
In The Last Decade
C.J. Densham
11 papers receiving 76 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 27
- Radiation 16
- Aerospace Engineering 30
- Biomedical Engineering 33
- Ecological Modeling 3
Countries citing papers authored by C.J. Densham
This map shows the geographic impact of C.J. Densham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.J. Densham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.J. Densham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C.J. Densham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.J. Densham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.J. Densham. The network helps show where C.J. Densham may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.J. Densham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 14 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 12 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 10 | |
| 5 | The Potential of Fluidised Powder Target Technology in High Power Accelerator Facilities | 2009 | 8 |
| 6 | 2004 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 1 |
About C.J. Densham
C.J. Densham is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Radiation, Biomedical Engineering, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 11 papers that have together received 78 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Superconducting Materials and Applications (7 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (6 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (4 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (3 papers), Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (2 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (2 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (2 papers) and Granular flow and fluidized beds (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (27 citations), Radiation (16 citations), Aerospace Engineering (30 citations), Biomedical Engineering (33 citations) and Ecological Modeling (3 citations). C.J. Densham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and France. Frequent co-authors include Thomas W. Davies, O. Caretta, E. Holtom, T. Davenne, Jonathan Mark Butterworth, D.E. Baynham, P. Loveridge, F.S. Carr, David J. Evans and M.J.D. Courthold. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Journal of Nuclear Materials, Powder Technology and Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.