Cicero

4.0k citations
42 papers · 557 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies
    • Historical and Literary Studies
  • Classics top 5%
    • Medieval Literature and History

Papers in

Cicero

29 papers receiving 226 citations

Peers

Cicero
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Anthropology 407
  • Classics 107
  • Philosophy 179
  • Archeology 138
  • Law 56
Replace David S. Levene with:
David S. Levene United Kingdom
William Fitzgerald United Kingdom
Gregory O. Hutchinson United Kingdom
Andrew R. Dyck United States
Niall W. Slater United States
Gordon Willis Williams United States
Karl Galinsky United States
Michèle Lowrie United States
Ingo Gildenhard United Kingdom
Peter Krentz United States
Cicero relative to David S. Levene United Kingdom David S. Levene's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
David S. Levene · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cicero

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cicero's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cicero with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cicero more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cicero

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cicero. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cicero. The network helps show where Cicero may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Cicero, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cicero Line = papers co-authored together Cicero links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1966160
2 1978149
3
Orations Of Marcus Tullius Cicero...
201144
4 199141
5 198824
6
On Moral Ends
200124
7 195122
8 199619
9
Letters to friends
20018
10 19606
11
Cicero: In L. Calpurnium Pisonem Oratio
19876
12
SHiP Experiment - Comprehensive Design Study report
20196
13
In L. Calpurnium Pisonem, oratio
19615
14 19745
15 19684
16 20184
17
Cicero's Topica
20044
18
On Obligations: De Officiis
20083
19 19802
20 20062

About Cicero

Cicero is a scholar working on Anthropology, Philosophy, History, Political Science and International Relations and Organic Chemistry, having authored 42 papers that have together received 557 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (12 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (6 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper), History of Medicine Studies (1 paper), Classical Studies and Legal History (1 paper), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (1 paper), Historical and Linguistic Studies (1 paper) and Educational and Social Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (407 citations), Classics (107 citations), Philosophy (179 citations), Archeology (138 citations) and Law (56 citations). Frequent co-authors include D. R. Shackleton Bailey, Robin G. M. Nisbet, Robert J. Rowland, Jon Powell, John Paul Adams, A. E. Douglas, S. E. Smethurst, Philip Levine, Michael Grant and Susan Treggiari. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical World, Phoenix, British Journal of Educational Studies, Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) and Akademie Verlag eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact