Christopher Tuck
Impact in
- Automotive Engineering top 0.01%
- Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
- Mechanical Engineering top 0.02%
- Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
- High Entropy Alloys Studies
- Cellular and Composite Structures
- Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
Papers in
-
- Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies 120
-
- 3D Printing in Biomedical Research 29
- Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials 22
- Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques 13
- Co-authors
- Richard Hague (111 shared papers)Ian Ashcroft (52 shared papers)Nesma T. Aboulkhair (25 shared papers)Ian Maskery (26 shared papers)Marco Simonelli (22 shared papers)Ricky D. Wildman (93 shared papers)Nicola M. Everitt (10 shared papers)Ruth Goodridge (11 shared papers)
- Journals
- Additive manufacturing (23 papers)Materials & Design (6 papers)ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (5 papers)Scientific Reports (4 papers)Journal of Materials Processing Technology (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Christopher Tuck
196 papers receiving 16.2k citations
Christopher Tuck's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 166
- Automotive Engineering 10.6k
- Mechanical Engineering 11.5k
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 2.3k
- Biomedical Engineering 3.1k
- Building and Construction 941
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Tuck
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Tuck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Tuck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Tuck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Tuck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Tuck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Tuck. The network helps show where Christopher Tuck may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Tuck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 204 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3D printing of Aluminium alloys: Additive Manufacturing of Aluminium alloys using selective laser melting Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 1249 |
| 2 | Reducing porosity in AlSi10Mg parts processed by selective laser melting Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 1138 |
| 3 | Effect of the build orientation on the mechanical properties and fracture modes of SLM Ti–6Al–4V Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 848 |
| 4 | Laser sintering of polyamides and other polymers Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 703 |
| 5 | Additive manufacturing of advanced ceramic materials Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 628 |
| 6 | The microstructure and mechanical properties of selectively laser melted AlSi10Mg: The effect of a conventional T6-like heat treatment Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 575 |
| 7 | A mechanical property evaluation of graded density Al-Si10-Mg lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 570 |
| 8 | Insights into the mechanical properties of several triply periodic minimal surface lattice structures made by polymer additive manufacturing Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 538 |
| 9 | The cost of additive manufacturing: machine productivity, economies of scale and technology-push Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 519 |
| 10 | Compressive failure modes and energy absorption in additively manufactured double gyroid lattices Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 494 |
| 11 | Additive manufacturing of metamaterials: A review Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 372 |
| 12 | Effective design and simulation of surface-based lattice structures featuring volume fraction and cell type grading Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 350 |
| 13 | 2014 | 309 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 295 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 291 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 284 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 284 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 283 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 277 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 236 |
About Christopher Tuck
Christopher Tuck is a scholar working on Automotive Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 204 papers that have together received 16.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies (120 papers), Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes (53 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (35 papers), Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies (32 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (29 papers), Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (22 papers), Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses (19 papers) and Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Automotive Engineering (10.6k citations), Mechanical Engineering (11.5k citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (2.3k citations), Biomedical Engineering (3.1k citations) and Building and Construction (941 citations). Christopher Tuck has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Richard Hague, Ian Ashcroft, Nesma T. Aboulkhair, Ian Maskery, Marco Simonelli, Ricky D. Wildman, Nicola M. Everitt, Ruth Goodridge, Y. Y. Tse and Adedeji Aremu. Their work appears in journals such as Additive manufacturing, Materials & Design, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, Scientific Reports and Journal of Materials Processing Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.