Christopher L. Claypool

543 citations
10 papers · 455 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher L. Claypool

10 papers receiving 445 citations

Peers

Christopher L. Claypool
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 233
  • Biomedical Engineering 292
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 266
  • Electrochemistry 25
  • Structural Biology 4
Replace Richard J. Brooke with:
Richard J. Brooke United Kingdom
Zhigang Gao China
Yina Li China
Junyi Huang China
Andrea La Rosa Spain
Jian Tang China
Zhisheng Peng China
Traian Popescu Romania
Felix Haag Germany
Christopher L. Claypool relative to Richard J. Brooke United Kingdom Richard J. Brooke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Richard J. Brooke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher L. Claypool

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher L. Claypool's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher L. Claypool with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher L. Claypool more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher L. Claypool

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher L. Claypool. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher L. Claypool. The network helps show where Christopher L. Claypool may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Christopher L. Claypool, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher L. Claypool Line = papers co-authored together Christopher L. Claypool links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 1997244
2 199770
3 201864
4 199930
5 199920
6 200518
7 19944
8 19962
9 19942
10 19941

About Christopher L. Claypool

Christopher L. Claypool is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Inorganic Chemistry and Organic Chemistry, having authored 10 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds (4 papers), Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (4 papers), Surface Chemistry and Catalysis (4 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (3 papers), Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics (2 papers), Maritime Ports and Logistics (1 paper), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (1 paper) and Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (233 citations), Biomedical Engineering (292 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (266 citations), Electrochemistry (25 citations) and Structural Biology (4 citations). Christopher L. Claypool has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Francesco Faglioni, William A. Goddard, Nathan S. Lewis, Harry B. Gray, R. A. Marcus, Péter Kelle, Mingzhou Jin, Helmut Schneider, Adam J. Matzger and Patty Wisian‐Neilson. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Macromolecules, International Journal of Production Economics, Journal of Chemical Education and Phosphorus, sulfur, and silicon and the related elements.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact