Christopher J. Pipe

743 citations
8 papers · 602 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher J. Pipe

7 papers receiving 593 citations

Peers

Christopher J. Pipe
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 316
  • Computational Mechanics 168
  • Biomedical Engineering 298
  • Ocean Engineering 53
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 92
Replace Cameron C. Hopkins with:
Cameron C. Hopkins Japan
Lucy E. Rodd Australia
Johannes Soulages United States
Nick O. Jaensson Netherlands
R. A. Mashelkar India
Noriyasu Mori Japan
Yiran Zhang China
Howard See Australia
Juan Pablo Segovia-Gutiérrez Spain
Masaaki Motozawa Japan
Christopher J. Pipe relative to Cameron C. Hopkins Japan Cameron C. Hopkins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×44×
Cameron C. Hopkins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher J. Pipe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher J. Pipe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher J. Pipe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher J. Pipe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher J. Pipe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher J. Pipe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher J. Pipe. The network helps show where Christopher J. Pipe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Christopher J. Pipe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher J. Pipe Line = papers co-authored together Christopher J. Pipe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown

About Christopher J. Pipe

Christopher J. Pipe is a scholar working on Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Biomedical Engineering, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Computational Mechanics and Organic Chemistry, having authored 8 papers that have together received 602 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (3 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis (2 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (2 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (2 papers), Migration, Policy, and Dickens Studies (1 paper), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (1 paper) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (316 citations), Computational Mechanics (168 citations), Biomedical Engineering (298 citations), Ocean Engineering (53 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (92 citations). Christopher J. Pipe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Gareth H. McKinley, Trushant Majmudar, Johannes Soulages, Thomas J. Ober, Simon J. Haward, Eric Lauga and Seung-Jong Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Rheologica Acta, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, Mechanics Research Communications, Frontiers in Physics and The Indexer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact