Christopher J. Pipe
Impact in
-
- Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
- Computational Mechanics top 5%
- Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films
- Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Papers in
-
- Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies 6
-
- Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications 3
- Co-authors
- Gareth H. McKinley (4 shared papers)Trushant Majmudar (1 shared paper)Thomas J. Ober (1 shared paper)Simon J. Haward (1 shared paper)Johannes Soulages (1 shared paper)Eric Lauga (1 shared paper)Seung-Jong Lee (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Rheologica Acta (2 papers)Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics (1 paper)Mechanics Research Communications (1 paper)Frontiers in Physics (1 paper)The Indexer (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandPortugal
In The Last Decade
Christopher J. Pipe
7 papers receiving 632 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 329
- Computational Mechanics 171
- Biomedical Engineering 316
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics 4
- Ocean Engineering 54
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher J. Pipe
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher J. Pipe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher J. Pipe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher J. Pipe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher J. Pipe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher J. Pipe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher J. Pipe. The network helps show where Christopher J. Pipe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Christopher J. Pipe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 215 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 209 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 127 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 29 | |
| 6 | Capillary breakup extensional rheometry of a wormlike micellar solution | 2010 | 26 |
| 7 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 0 |
About Christopher J. Pipe
Christopher J. Pipe is a scholar working on Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Biomedical Engineering, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Computational Mechanics and Organic Chemistry, having authored 8 papers that have together received 641 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (3 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (2 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis (2 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (2 papers), Migration, Policy, and Dickens Studies (1 paper), Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques (1 paper) and Injection Molding Process and Properties (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (329 citations), Computational Mechanics (171 citations), Biomedical Engineering (316 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (4 citations) and Ocean Engineering (54 citations). Christopher J. Pipe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Gareth H. McKinley, Trushant Majmudar, Thomas J. Ober, Simon J. Haward, Johannes Soulages, Eric Lauga and Seung-Jong Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Rheologica Acta, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, Mechanics Research Communications, Frontiers in Physics and The Indexer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.