Christopher E. Carlton

1.4k citations
98 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher E. Carlton

95 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Christopher E. Carlton
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Insect Science 648
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 579
  • Ecological Modeling 67
  • Ecology 373
  • Genetics 374
Replace Michael J. Sharkey with:
Michael J. Sharkey United States
Viviana A. Confalonieri Argentina
Arturo Baz Spain
Daniel González‐Tokman Mexico
Neal L. Evenhuis United States
Tullia Zetto Brandmayr Italy
Alessio De Biase Italy
Andrea S. Sequeira United States
Stephen A. Marshall Canada
Fadia Sara Ceccarelli Mexico
Christopher E. Carlton relative to Michael J. Sharkey United States Michael J. Sharkey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Michael J. Sharkey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher E. Carlton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher E. Carlton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher E. Carlton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher E. Carlton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher E. Carlton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher E. Carlton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher E. Carlton. The network helps show where Christopher E. Carlton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher E. Carlton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher E. Carlton Line = papers co-authored together Christopher E. Carlton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003106
2 199867
3 200566
4 200551
5 198846
6 200441
7 200237
8 201532
9 199930
10 199828
11 201028
12 200526
13 199126
14 200724
15 199321
16 199820
17 200920
18 201318
19 200717
20 200717

About Christopher E. Carlton

Christopher E. Carlton is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Ecology, Genetics and Plant Science, having authored 98 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution (48 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (34 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (32 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (16 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (12 papers), Fossil Insects in Amber (11 papers), Plant and animal studies (9 papers) and Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (648 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (579 citations), Ecological Modeling (67 citations), Ecology (373 citations) and Genetics (374 citations). Christopher E. Carlton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Randel Tom Cox, J. L. Bossart, Richard A. B. Leschen, Michael L. Ferro, T. E. Reagan, Henry W. Robison, Russell F. Mizell, Serguei V. Triapitsyn, Matthew L. Gimmel and Kyle E. Harms. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the Entomological Society of America, Zootaxa, Journal of Medical Entomology, Journal of Economic Entomology and ZooKeys.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact